Jan. 6th, 2018 at 4:21 PM
[Filtered to Council & Jury]
I move to bring Amendments 3A.8, 3A.9, and affiliated revisions to a Council VOTE.
I would also like to discuss, hopefully vote, on two proposed amendments, the first clarifying resistance:6A.6) Actions taken against the Scientists, their assistants, or any Wittgenstein property shall not be counted as an offense except to the extent that they directly impact the rights, liberties, or bodily autonomy of other specimens for which they will still be held to account.
and one writtenwithby Charles Xavier's input addressing Hotel's concerns.3A.10) All specimens shall have equal and unfettered access to their rooms, equipment, commissary funds and leisure time to which scientists have no claim. It is unlawful to impose uncompensated labor or exercise on specimens or punish them or any others for a failure to consent.
Though I still believe there is an ethical obligation on the part of Hotel under Article 3B to do this work and any active attempts to sabotage the work or extract quid pro quos should be dealt with. I will also admit that I am perhaps overly passionate at times. Particularly under circumstances such as this.
Now that said. I wouldn't know where to begin if any further amendments seem worth discussing. But these feel like a priority.