[info]keieeeye in [info]07refugees

new article

Firefox news: Livejournal Draws a Line in the Sand.

Includes a hypothetical that is actually making me ponder now - a vampire that has the body of a 14 year old, while being 1400 years old, doing naughty things. Since the objection to underage sexual activity is that their brains aren't developed enough to give informed consent, and theoretically the vampire would be old enough to, presumably... But personally, a 14 year's old body, still creepy. I think to me that's the sort of thing that's okay, but I wouldn't do it myself, and I'd possibly be casting a wary eye on the people who'd jump at the chance (depending on their age, circumstances, etc, obviously). :P

Comments

I had a PWP with an actual 15 year old and that was apparently okay too. And yet, pondi gets a permaban for a picture that was supposed to go with a story where Harry is 22. It boggles the mind.
It is so crazy! And it would have been nice if they had come out and said that the rules for art would be different before they started suspending artists :(
Or before they started selling permanent accounts.
Careful. Her latest post clarifies that Harry's age in that pic is indeterminate.
It is in the picture, yes. As I understand it you need to do research to actually find that it's connected with a story and that in the story he's 22. It's possible that the sources I had for that understanding are mistaken or confused, though. :P