[info]stewardess wrote
on March 8th, 2008 at 10:05 am

"So are they stating only imagery can be adult content, not words?" In practice (which is really all that matters, because they are free to ignore their own guidelines), that seems to be the case. So far, they have been ignoring most text, even if it is that ultimate crime, minors engaging in sex. For instance, they passed a story about an 18 year old boy and a 14 year old boy engaged in explicit sex.

What do you want to bet that non-photographic images of minors (that includes 17 year olds) will be banned if they are so much as kissing while fully clothed?
(Read Comments)
From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
( )OpenID
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message: