I'm writing a story that takes into account most of what happened up to HBP and then goes AU. The problem is that I don't know whether my idea - the story I want to tell - is translating itself properly to the reader. I know what I intend to say, but I have no idea whether it's coming across. The thing is that the story starts when Harry is 23. Voldemort has finally been defeated after years of war. A lot has happened in the interim, which I do explain in the course of the story, but at the start of the story the situation is very different from the wizarding world as it is in canon, and most differences do not get explained at once. The story deals with the first meeting of Harry and Snape since the night Snape killed Dumbledore, and then with their slowly developing relationship, and also with cleaning up the post-war mess, and rebuilding their society.
What I basically would like to know is whether I'm on the right track, or whether I need to be explaining more. Are my characterizations of Snape and Harry believable, or do I need to go into more detail to explain why they are acting as they are?
( Tell me what you think? )
What I basically would like to know is whether I'm on the right track, or whether I need to be explaining more. Are my characterizations of Snape and Harry believable, or do I need to go into more detail to explain why they are acting as they are?
( Tell me what you think? )
15 comments | Leave a comment