Daily Scans Below are the 13 most recent journal entries recorded in the "Daily Scans" journal:
November 11th, 2009
02:24 pm
[mysteryfan]

[Link]

Spoiler: Batman #693

Tags: , , , ,

(116 comments | Leave a comment)

02:02 pm
[interrobamf]

[Link]

Character development? Not when Tony Daniel's on the job!

Tags: ,

(69 comments | Leave a comment)

November 10th, 2009
11:48 am
[mysteryfan]

[Link]

Preview/Spoilers: Batman #693

Tags: , , , ,

(40 comments | Leave a comment)

November 2nd, 2009
12:12 pm
[kingsuperman]

[Link]

Batman #692

Tags: , , , ,

(28 comments | Leave a comment)

October 31st, 2009
06:40 am
[mysteryfan]

[Link]

Spoilers: Batman #692. Dick and Selina. And Bruce.

Tags: , , , , ,

(80 comments | Leave a comment)

September 24th, 2009
09:40 pm
[benicio127]

[Link]

Jason and Tim.... a different kind of brotherly first meeting....
Jason and Tim first meet.

Not exactly brotherly love at first sight....

From Teen Titans 29, written by Geoff Johns. Posting after talking with both [info]lipsofpoison and [info]runespoor7. (Seven & a half scans I believe)

Tags: , , , , ,

(67 comments | Leave a comment)

August 18th, 2009
12:17 am
[parsimonia]

[Link]

November Solicit for Batman

Tags: , , ,

(63 comments | Leave a comment)

July 30th, 2009
10:11 pm
[arbre_rieur]

[Link]

When Alan Moore was crap
The 90s has a rep as a bad time for mainstream comics, and rightfully so. It was some terrible black hole of awfulness, sucking even normally decent writers into its depths. It was almost as if anything produced in the 90s (yeah, yeah, there were a couple of exceptions) would automatically suck, simply because it was 90s, and if a comic was made in the 90s, it was going to be terrible. Because it was the 90s.

Even Alan Moore managed to be complete crap in the 90s (though he recovered towards the tail end of that decade). Some of his work during this period is really appallingly bad. As evidence, I present to you the two-lane pile-up in mini-series form that is Spawn: Blood Feud.



Tags: , , ,

(42 comments | Leave a comment)

July 3rd, 2009
05:38 pm
[lipsofpoison]
[User Picture]

[Link]

Batman #641 vs. Battle for the Cowl #2
Upon rereading Under the Hood, I noticed something that I loved from Jason at the time and something that I wish had stayed consistant on, to be honest.

2 scans )

1 scan )

Tags: , , , ,

(149 comments | Leave a comment)

May 23rd, 2009
07:34 pm
[filbypott]

[Link]

HE RETURNS.
So.

Batman: The Battle for the Cowl has come and gone, and lo, it was a total clusterfuck, as was widely expected.

But.

There was one page in #3 that made me sit up. Made me laugh, made me cheer. I speak of the uncalled-for return of one of the greatest characters of the Bat-mythos.

Of which luminary do I speak? I SHALL TELL YOU.

Tags: , , , ,

(29 comments | Leave a comment)

May 20th, 2009
04:01 pm
[xdoop]
[User Picture]

[Link]

Batman: Battle for the Cowl #3

Wat. )

Tags: , , , , ,

(170 comments | Leave a comment)

May 6th, 2009
03:28 pm
[xdoop]
[User Picture]

[Link]

Why is Huntress back in her Jim Lee outfit?

One of the differences between the solicited version of Battle for the Cowl: The Network and the final version. Art by José Ladrönn.

From Tony Daniel's blog: "Um let's see - the Huntress I went to Jim's design for 2 reasons, the first is I feel it is sexier and she pops more. The other costume is too much black, which is fine, but in the book there's so much black already. And I like showing some skin when I can. I'm having a blast with all the female characters that I'm now getting a chance to handle. Women are easier to draw than men (for me) so I just have a great time whenever they're featured."

Tags: , , , ,

(73 comments | Leave a comment)

April 8th, 2009
01:31 pm
[bluefall]

[Link]

This was totally worth killing three good titles for.
Know what's a horrible, beautiful, fascinating disaster?

Tags: , , , ,

(120 comments | Leave a comment)

Powered by InsaneJournal