InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "kisses and snuggles"

groosealoose (groosealoose) wrote in scans_daily,
@ 2009-09-14 20:55:00

Entry tags:

char: beast boy/changeling/gar logan, medium: webcomic, publisher: dc comics, title: teen titans

A comic to lift your spirits

The guy shown here is not supposed to be representative of scans daily posters as a whole who I know to contain a number of real actual women and also furries.

Oh, and for legality:

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	Re: Official Warning taggerung301 2009-09-14 09:57 pm UTC (link)
	I'm gonna have to agree with psychosesman here (and hope that I don't get warned . . .) :( (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Official Warning psychosesman 2009-09-14 09:59 pm UTC (link)
	If you do get warned for agreeing with a dissenting opinion it would be symptomatic of a pretty saddening level of insularity and mistrust for perceived "outsiders" in the community, wouldn't it? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Official Warning angelophile 2009-09-14 10:15 pm UTC (link)
	There's a big difference between expressing a dissenting opinion and portraying people offended by the storyline the way they are in the second panel there. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Official Warning khamelea 2009-09-14 10:18 pm UTC (link)
	"There's a big difference between expressing a dissenting opinion and portraying people offended by the storyline the way they are in the second panel there." But... the second panel isn't a part of the punchline! Which makes it wrong to actually respond to it for some reason. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Official Warning schmevil 2009-09-14 10:38 pm UTC (link)
	How so? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Official Warning schmevil 2009-09-14 10:39 pm UTC (link)
	Wait, were you being sarcastic? -_- (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Official Warning khamelea 2009-09-14 10:45 pm UTC (link)
	I was. There's been comments about how responding to the first two panels is missing the point of the the comic, and I was trying (and failing) to make light of that. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Official Warning schmevil 2009-09-14 10:47 pm UTC (link)
	Sorry - just got up from a nap. Caffeine is required! (Reply to this) (Parent)

	Re: Official Warning daso 2009-09-14 10:19 pm UTC (link)
	I think "psychosesman" was referring to "taggerung301" who expressed a concern for getting warned when Xe (did I do that right?) spoke out against the decision to warn "groosealoose" (Reply to this) (Parent)

(Read comments) -