InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "YEAH! OKAAAY!"

groosealoose (groosealoose) wrote in scans_daily,
@ 2009-09-14 20:55:00

Entry tags:

char: beast boy/changeling/gar logan, medium: webcomic, publisher: dc comics, title: teen titans

A comic to lift your spirits

The guy shown here is not supposed to be representative of scans daily posters as a whole who I know to contain a number of real actual women and also furries.

Oh, and for legality:

(Post a new comment)

	stolisomancer 2009-09-14 08:08 pm UTC (link)
	I believe part of the reason this became a kerfluffle is that the events were only ambiguous in their degree; the situation was either highly troubling or very troubling, but was never going to be not troubling. This strip could apply to some discussions, both here and elsewhere, but I don't think it's an accurate enough description to serve as a parody. (Reply to this)

angelophile
2009-09-14 08:19 pm UTC (link)

But the comic doesn't portray an "ambiguous series of events that could be potentially offensive". It portrays a series of events that IS offensive. Playing rape as comedy in a mainstream comic is never cool, even if the rape itself didn't take place, the readers were meant to think it did, therefore it's still playing rape for laughs.

And people getting angry about it? Good. I'm glad. people SHOULD be angry about it and calling out Marvel on the bullshit because that's part of what our ethos is all about.

This cartoon both really misses the mark and also the multiple reasons why people are upset and angry about the sequence and belittles legitimate complaints.

(Reply to this)

	ashtoreth 2009-09-14 08:25 pm UTC (link)
	It's difficult to tell if you're honestly trying to be friendly. In any case, I think it's time to move on to different subjects, don't you? (Reply to this) (Thread)

	darklorelei 2009-09-14 08:35 pm UTC (link)
	So much this. =/ (Reply to this) (Parent)

	taggerung301 2009-09-14 08:32 pm UTC (link)
	well, this did make me giggle I think the dislike of the rape issue in Spiderman is justified, and this IS kinda making fun of us, but those last two panels on this are pretty good, especially facial expression-wise I suppose this should be taken with a grain of salt who did this comic by the way? (Reply to this) (Thread)

	groosealoose 2009-09-14 08:36 pm UTC (link)
	well, it was me (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) -

taggerung301, 2009-09-14 08:41 pm UTC

(no subject) -

groosealoose, 2009-09-14 08:45 pm UTC

	scottyquick 2009-09-14 11:59 pm UTC (link)
	Yeah, the first three are okay, but the last two are great. (Reply to this) (Parent)

	majingojira 2009-09-14 08:34 pm UTC (link)
	I've seen political cartoons that miss the mark about as much as this one did. I guess that means Webcomics are now an official artistic medium now! (Reply to this) (Thread)

	schmevil 2009-09-14 09:36 pm UTC (link)
	LOL! (Reply to this) (Parent)

	scottyquick 2009-09-14 09:45 pm UTC (link)
	This is like the funniest thing I've read all day. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) -

majingojira, 2009-09-14 11:51 pm UTC

(no subject) -

starpiper, 2009-09-16 09:25 pm UTC

	mugiwara 2009-09-14 08:39 pm UTC (link)
	Are you talking about the angry reactions after someone posted the comedy rape of Kyle Rayner by Bueno Excellente? Oh wait... (Reply to this) (Thread)

	timemonkey 2009-09-15 12:42 am UTC (link)
	I was angry about it. But I believe I used my agry comments when it was posted to the original comm. (Reply to this) (Parent)

	toasty_fresh 2009-09-14 08:42 pm UTC (link)
	Belittling concerns about rape being portrayed as humorous in a comic probably isn't the best way to start a post around here, jsyk. (Reply to this) (Thread)

	daso 2009-09-14 08:48 pm UTC (link)
	The punchline is in the last two panels, not the first two. (anyone thinking scans_daily changed the plot of ASM #605 and that FVL is lying about it takes naivity to a new level) (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) -

toasty_fresh, 2009-09-14 09:00 pm UTC

(no subject) -

daso, 2009-09-14 09:18 pm UTC

(no subject) -

toasty_fresh, 2009-09-14 09:22 pm UTC

(no subject) -

khamelea, 2009-09-14 09:24 pm UTC

Mod Note -

angelophile, 2009-09-14 09:30 pm UTC

Re: Mod Note -

daso, 2009-09-14 09:38 pm UTC

(no subject) -

toasty_fresh, 2009-09-14 09:35 pm UTC

(no subject) -

daso, 2009-09-14 09:44 pm UTC

	scottyquick 2009-09-14 08:45 pm UTC (link)
	I want a keyboard with a "post" sound effect! (Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) -

taggerung301, 2009-09-14 08:48 pm UTC

(no subject) -

scottyquick, 2009-09-14 08:49 pm UTC

(no subject) -

taggerung301, 2009-09-14 08:52 pm UTC

(no subject) -

scottyquick, 2009-09-14 09:42 pm UTC

(no subject) -

galateus, 2009-09-15 03:52 am UTC

(no subject) -

icon_uk, 2009-09-14 08:59 pm UTC

	arilou_skiff 2009-09-14 08:59 pm UTC (link)
	To be honest, it feels a bit long, you could probably lose a panel (not sure which one though) to make the thing read better. (Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) -

arilou_skiff, 2009-09-14 08:59 pm UTC

(no subject) -

groosealoose, 2009-09-14 09:05 pm UTC

(no subject) -

suzene, 2009-09-15 07:36 am UTC

	foxhack 2009-09-14 09:24 pm UTC (link)
	OH MY GOD THERE'S WOMEN AND FURRIES HERE?! EWWWWWWW! (Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) -

groosealoose, 2009-09-14 09:27 pm UTC

(no subject) -

taggerung301, 2009-09-14 09:30 pm UTC

(no subject) -

psychosesman, 2009-09-14 09:57 pm UTC

(no subject) -

daso, 2009-09-14 10:09 pm UTC

(no subject) -

icon_uk, 2009-09-14 10:19 pm UTC

(no subject) -

daso, 2009-09-14 10:32 pm UTC

	khamelea 2009-09-14 09:41 pm UTC (link)
	I really don't see how the events from the next issue should alter my distaste of the storyline, since it's based on the manner and tone in which an apparent sequence of events was treated. The fact that this apparent sequence of event contained a bit of misdirection isn't really relevant to that. (Reply to this)

Official Warning

angelophile
2009-09-14 09:42 pm UTC (link)

Following on from my comment above and after discussion with my fellow mods,

groosealoose:

"This is your FIRST OFFICIAL WARNING. Please note that if you receive two further warnings you will lose the ability to post on this community."

The reason you're being given this warning is because of the fact that this comic is a very thinly veiled attack post against members of the community with legitimate concerns with no apparent interest in fair discussion. You'd earn a warning for typing this and putting it in comic form doesn't negate the impact.