Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "Gimme moar!"

Username: 
Password:    
Remember Me
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
Search by : 
  • View
    • Create Account
    • IJ Login
    • OpenID Login
  • Journal
    • Post
    • Edit Entries
    • Customize Journal
    • Comment Settings
    • Recent Comments
    • Manage Tags
  • Account
    • Manage Account
    • Viewing Options
    • Manage Profile
    • Manage Notifications
    • Manage Pictures
    • Manage Schools
    • Account Status
  • Friends
    • Edit Friends
    • Edit Custom Groups
    • Friends Filter
    • Nudge Friends
    • Invite
    • Create RSS Feed
  • Asylums
    • Post
    • Asylum Invitations
    • Manage Asylums
    • Create Asylum
  • Site
    • Support
    • Upgrade Account
    • FAQs
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Interest
    • Search Randomly

box_in_the_box ([info]box_in_the_box) wrote in [info]scans_daily,
@ 2009-08-28 14:38:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:creator: steve ditko, theme: objectivism

"If only that Ditko fellow was less subtle and more overt regarding his personal politics ..."
For as much fail as it churns out, Big Hollywood occasionally offers some genuine gems.

I can't stand Objectivism, but I find Steve Ditko's treatment of it irresistibly compelling, perhaps because the comic book medium is a far more appropriate venue for such a Manichean philosophy than the thousand-page rape-justifying tomes that Ayn Rand routinely shat out (it certainly helps that none of Ditko's characters ever barfed up a 70-page screed like John Galt, not to mention the fact that Ditko actually managed to create characters who were more believable as human beings than any of Rand's strawmen or Mary Sues, even when his characters were radioactivity-powered superheroes).

The following four pages constitute "In Principle: The Unchecked Premise," a short story originally published in the 160-page graphic novel Steve Ditko's Static in 1988:






As crudely simplistic as it is, it's still better than either reading or watching the "fireplace scene" between Howard Roark and Dominique Francon in The Fountainhead, but then again, so is getting punched in the crotch until you hemorrhage internally and die.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]pi216
2009-08-29 03:50 am UTC (link)
But the doctors wouldn't have to compete. If they enter into a coalition where no doctor underbids another doctor, they fulfill both 'serve my own interests' and 'don't be charitable'. Dealing with one doctor becomes dealing with ANY doctor becomes 'every doctor gets everything you have for otherwise fatal or debilitating misfortune'.

There's no 'geographic circumscription on the market' or 'next iteration' consideration in any of Rand's stuff, that I know of, beyond "remake the system in a way that lets us always do what we want and have candy whenever we want", and that's where the philosophy necessarily fails. The second generation of ideologically pure Objectivist society swallows the first alive. Unless they don't breed, since children are little charity-cases anyway, and then the society goes the same way as the Shakers did.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Read comments) -


Home | Site Map | Manage Account | TOS | Privacy | Support | FAQs