InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "Where is Waldo??"

trueredorion (trueredorion) wrote in scans_daily,
@ 2009-08-20 20:08:00

Entry tags:

char: iron man/tony stark, char: thor, creator: patrick zircher, publisher: marvel comics

Zircher's Iron Man
The variant cover to Invincible Iron Man #20 under the cut.

I love the art but knowing Fraction this will end with Thor forgiving Tony while completely white-washing Tony's involvement in any wrongdoing like he's did with the Spider-Man guest-appearance and his continued use of Hill.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	xdoop 2009-08-21 04:25 am UTC (link)
	Right, because Rogue told Mystique ahead of time she didn't want her using the baby to save her? And what makes you think Mystique expected the baby to die? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

trueredorion
2009-08-21 04:38 am UTC (link)

So Mystique doesn't know Rogue at all? Because it's pretty goddamn easy to see she wouldn't want to even risk the life of the baby to save herself. Gambit even says as much. So either Mystique didn't care what Rogue wanted or she doesn't know her "beloved" daughter at all.

And the way Mystique hides whats she's going to to do with the baby from Gambit led me to believe it along with the way she tells Rogue it's still alive like even she didn't expect it. And even if she didn't expect the child to die she still orchestrated events that resulted in multiple other deaths to get the child which Rogue herself calls her on.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	xdoop 2009-08-21 05:08 am UTC (link)
	So Mystique doesn't know Rogue at all? Because it's pretty goddamn easy to see she wouldn't want to even risk the life of the baby to save herself. Gambit even says as much. So either Mystique didn't care what Rogue wanted or she doesn't know her "beloved" daughter at all. Destiny foretold that Mystique would save Rogue, and that Rogue would love her again. (Reply to this) (Parent)

(Read comments) -