Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "Jump off the bandwagon!"

Username: 
Password:    
Remember Me
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
Search by : 
  • View
    • Create Account
    • IJ Login
    • OpenID Login
  • Journal
    • Post
    • Edit Entries
    • Customize Journal
    • Comment Settings
    • Recent Comments
    • Manage Tags
  • Account
    • Manage Account
    • Viewing Options
    • Manage Profile
    • Manage Notifications
    • Manage Pictures
    • Manage Schools
    • Account Status
  • Friends
    • Edit Friends
    • Edit Custom Groups
    • Friends Filter
    • Nudge Friends
    • Invite
    • Create RSS Feed
  • Asylums
    • Post
    • Asylum Invitations
    • Manage Asylums
    • Create Asylum
  • Site
    • Support
    • Upgrade Account
    • FAQs
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Interest
    • Search Randomly

jlroberson ([info]jlroberson) wrote in [info]scans_daily,
@ 2009-05-16 01:26:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current location:Seattle
Current mood: blah
Current music:Fischerspooner
Entry tags:creator: alan moore, creator: kevin o'neill

Mack the Ripper, or Lulu Never Gets A Break
A bit that stuck out from the immensely enjoyable new League of Extraordinary Gentlemen.

At the moment, I happen to be working on a comics adaptation of Frank Wedekind's "Lulu," and poring over every version of it I can find. I even found a French TV version that had Udo Kier in it, as he always seems to be in everything.
As Alan Moore has over the years instilled in me a serious awareness of weird coincidences, I was pleasantly surprised and a little weirded out to see that, in the midst of his restaging of The Threepenny Opera(which he and O'Neill do as though born to it, but Moore has always had a serious Weill influence), he brought in--nearly precisely--the ending of the play "Pandora's Box," and made what is in the play, literally, Jack the Ripper, Macheath in the midst of Moore's new version of that song we all know well. And this Lulu is of course based on Louise Brooks, well-known to many here as the face of one of our posters. Anyway, I liked the sequence so here it is(though the new twist to "Pirate Jenny" is pretty awesome, but that would be too many pages):
Basic setup: It's London, and Macheath has returned, and Lulu is walking the streets, having gone through(fatally) a number of husbands, and ended up from wealth and status to this. (Not really through any fault of her own exactly. Men just destroy themselves around her)

And here we have an altercation with the first lesbian in Western fiction, Countess Geschwitz, obsessed with Lulu and rejected by her, and getting a bit tired with only having an old painting of her to cuddle. But Mackie's not having that.

And we say farewell to Lulu. Though there is this back cover, and there are any number of paintings just like this from the turn of the century. Depictions like this of women were very popular with middle-class salongoers.


I would add that an even stranger additional coincidence was the recent release of the "Tales of the Black Freighter"(which I liked) which has the "Pirate Jenny" song, quite central to LOEG, playing over the credits. But the imagery in that song is something that goes deep in Moore.
By the way, for fans of "the Ruling Class"--the 14th Earl of Gurney also plays a central part in this. Also Iain Sinclair's Billy Pilgrimish Norton from "Slow Chocolate Autopsy," who can travel in time but not in space and is trapped in London, flashing between eras, and Moore does a great pastiche of Sinclair. It also has Crowley, sort of, as usual with Moore these days. And Orlando turns out to be a real douchebag. I suggest getting it. For those who didn't like THE BLACK DOSSIER, here's your action. But now you'll also see the use of the info in it.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]fungo_squiggly
2009-05-16 01:20 pm UTC (link)
Jeff Nevins provides no references to support that claim. Until I see one, I say Jeff Nevins is full of crap.

Brecht's Macheath is a brutal gangster. According to the song at the beginning of the Threepenny Opera, he did once rape a young widow. Other than that he is identified as having murdered several victims... all of whom were men.

If you've read the actual Threepenny Opera you can see that Mack's motives are mercenary in nature. He presents himself in one of his final speeches as a "bourgeois artisan," an honest "businessman" compared to the emerging corporate world. Macheath is emphatically NOT presented as some kind of murderous sexual predator, which is what he seems to be in the above scans.

I studied Brecht's work in college and am a particular fan of the Threepenny Opera. While I also really like Moore's work and the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, if he really thinks that Mack the Knife is a Jack the Ripper analogue, it seems to me he completely missed the mark this time around.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]arbre_rieur
2009-05-16 04:37 pm UTC (link)
I don't think it's so much Moore thinking MacHeath is a Ripper analogue as Moore finding an opportunity to draw a connection. Isn't that pretty much his whole philosophy on League: Never have two characters be completely unrelated if you can find some way to connect them? You'll never see two people who coincidentally have the same name in these books.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]fungo_squiggly
2009-05-16 04:44 pm UTC (link)
That's certainly true. And usually I love that.

But I guess since I had this affection for Mack the Knife going in, in this particular case I find it annoying.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]jlroberson
2009-05-19 02:46 am UTC (link)
Well, I wrote Jess Nevins and he stands by it. And looking it up, the association of Macheath and Jack is a pretty frequent one in analysis, so I don't really see that Moore violated anything. Here are a few examples:
http://books.google.com/books?id=RkXN3O94MXIC&pg=PA38&lpg=PA38&dq=macheath+jack+the+ripper&source=bl&ots=MhpNdvi66D&sig=xYSYeFI97TWPH1j0IgLnNTmGelU&hl=en&ei=i98RStWlD4SQtAOxtPzmDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1

"Bertolt Brecht's Author Tract Threepenny Novel identifies the Villain Protagonist Macheath with Jack The Ripper." (from TV Tropes-- http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/JackTheRipper )

And here it's pointed out that while the character in the play might be as you describe, "Mack the Knife" in the ballad--NOT sung by Macheath--is more like the one we see in LOEG.
http://books.google.com/books?id=FceHj95WOZkC&pg=PA220&lpg=PA220&dq=macheath+jack+the+ripper&source=bl&ots=IsiOZ9CRL7&sig=RjZbN07XWxUBfR3VRH3CMsS7kTw&hl=en&ei=i98RStWlD4SQtAOxtPzmDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8#PPA220,M1

So I think it's all legit. I would also add some facts regarding Brecht: he himself played quite fast and loose with his source material, and changed it again radically for the film adaptation(for instance, making Macheath a truly Mabuse-level gang mastermind with a vast army of crooks--one wonders if he wanted Fritz Lang to end up directing it), so much so that it led to the lawsuit mentioned above. But that was over Brecht ceding creative control of the film adaptation, partly because Pabst wanted to scale it back to something more like the stage version(though the film version is hardly faithful, but all the play's unique effects are lost outside performance).

And given that Brecht screwed Weill over on royalties(taking 62% when it was he who was doing the least original work, while Weill's music was being made up whole cloth--Brecht threatened to just use the music composed for John Gay's version) and was generally a bastard to everyone he worked with, I can't say I feel too badly for him. The reason most of his work after 1925 was drawn from or relied upon the work of others is that from that year on he reportedly suffered "the mother of all writer's blocks."

I also think what's really interesting here is, whether consciously or not, by inserting Lulu(especially Brooks' version, which ironically was rejected by the German public at the time; Wedekind's Lulu was envisioned more like the woman who plays her--nude 75% of the film, btw--in the 1980 TV version) and connecting these things, the whole of it becomes a meta-reference to Pabst as well.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Read comments) -


Home | Site Map | Manage Account | TOS | Privacy | Support | FAQs