InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "A mass of quivering holes"

The Judges Of Sabra La Tau (sabra_la_iudex) wrote in sabra_la_tau,
@ 2009-10-31 14:12:00

Entry tags:

!days 071-079, !games, aeris gainsborough, allen walker, apollo justice, ashikawa mitsuru, claude c. kenni, excel, fay d. flourite, gokudera hayato, howard link, jace beleren, kuroba kaito, lady, minami ikki, rabi, ryougi shiki, sumeragi kururu, syaoran, {antillar maximus}, {chaz villette}, {elza scarlet}, {il palazzo}, {seki ray shiroe}, {tsuchimiya kagura}, {vash the stampede}, {{{akatsuki chika}}}, {{{almaz von almadine adamant}}}, {{{charlie crews}}}, {{{geddoe}}}, {{{hana morenos}}}, {{{isawa hako}}}, {{{james t. kirk}}}, {{{mao}}}, {{{mikaila}}}, {{{nora}}}, {{{revan}}}, {{{spock}}}, {{{tailmon}}}, {{{thorfinn}}}, {{{zelgadis greywords}}}, ~{surgeon}

Session 2
Who: Everyone
Where: Arena
When: Day 74, late evening
What: Game 54, Session 2

I believe that is enough time.

[You find yourself back in the arena... the screens are turning back on as you are finding your team's station...]

[Discussion
Game Start-Storage Room
Hallway, Downstairs
Hallway, Upstairs
Dorms 2
Aftermath threads.
Hypothesis thread.
Memories]

((Memories and stuff shall go up later todayyyy after I've had sleep. Thank you guys all so much.))

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	Re: Hypothesis thread doomclocked 2009-11-02 05:22 am UTC (link)
	...Moral dilemmas? Should I be having one of those? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread lawfulreception 2009-11-02 05:26 am UTC (link)
	No, I'm just referring to the people who weren't taking the game as seriously during the first half. They could have really endangered the characters. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread doomclocked 2009-11-02 05:30 am UTC (link)
	...It was a cruel game, but... they're all okay, right? They won. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread lawfulreception 2009-11-02 05:33 am UTC (link)
	Looks like it. I'm half expecting one last horrible thing to happen, but they've really been through enough. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread doomclocked 2009-11-02 05:37 am UTC (link)
	...Don't say that, you might jinx them. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread lawfulreception 2009-11-02 05:39 am UTC (link)
	--gkk, I'm not trying to! I take it back, I don't expect anything horrible to happen! (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread doomclocked 2009-11-02 05:43 am UTC (link)
	Right! They're going to have lots of good luck and win the next three games and get presents from everyone when they get home we're doing it in reverse, okay? It's an anti-jinx. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread lawfulreception 2009-11-02 05:47 am UTC (link)
	. . .a-anti-jinx. Fine, alright! Um! Not only will they win, but they'll win by having to do nothing but sit around and be pampered! By this judge! And they'll have plenty of food for a long time and also never be turned into animals again! Also maybe they get a swell writing pen as a departure gift!! (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread doomclocked 2009-11-02 05:50 am UTC (link)
	Ooooh, a swell pen, nice touch. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread lawfulreception 2009-11-02 05:53 am UTC (link)
	Well, yeah. It's useful but cool. We should have nice things. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread doomclocked 2009-11-02 05:57 am UTC (link)
	We should, we should. There's a serious lack of nice things here, I've noticed. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread lawfulreception 2009-11-02 06:00 am UTC (link)
	Yeah, but something tells me they don't really want us to. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread doomclocked 2009-11-02 06:08 am UTC (link)
	Well... I guess if they really wanted us to, they'd have given us something, right? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread lawfulreception 2009-11-02 06:15 am UTC (link)
	Right. And since they haven't, we can conclude that the Judges are why we can't have nice things. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread doomclocked 2009-11-02 06:18 am UTC (link)
	Maybe... if we try asking them nicely? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread lawfulreception 2009-11-02 06:20 am UTC (link)
	. . .I doubt it'd work, but if you ever do, try asking a Judge that doesn't stick people into computer games or turn them into demons. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread doomclocked 2009-11-02 06:24 am UTC (link)
	... Can you repeat that last thing you said? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread lawfulreception 2009-11-02 06:26 am UTC (link)
	. . .turn them into demons? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread doomclocked 2009-11-02 06:37 am UTC (link)
	Neat! (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread lawfulreception 2009-11-02 01:28 pm UTC (link)
	How is that neat? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread doomclocked 2009-11-02 01:51 pm UTC (link)
	Well, I mean, it's not neat neat because he probably didn't want it, right? But a demon sounds cool. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread lawfulreception 2009-11-02 01:58 pm UTC (link)
	No, they forced it on him from what I understand. . . .and I'm not sure I'm following. How could it be cool? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread doomclocked 2009-11-02 02:12 pm UTC (link)
	...I don't know! It's another one of those things that can't be explained. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread lawfulreception 2009-11-02 02:17 pm UTC (link)
	Eh? You just innately think something with fangs and claws and things is fine? Weird. . . (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: Hypothesis thread doomclocked 2009-11-02 02:20 pm UTC (link)
	But you innately follow people around writing about them. That's definitely weirder. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)