D.J. (djin7) wrote in snarry_games, @ 2008-01-03 23:05:00 |
|
|||
Entry tags: | mod post, polls |
The Future of the Snarry Games Poll
Welcome, Snarry Games fans and participants! The Mod Squad has been in deep discussions about the logistics, ideas and possibilities for the 2008 Games.
We wish to always strive to make our fest better, and improve every year based on the feedback we receive from both the Champions and the Spectators. This year, we are considering even more changes. We are considering some major ones, my friends. But first, we wish your feedback.
Please take a few moments to fill out our poll, and feel free to comment with any and all concerns or ideas to help us improve and make our 2008 Games the best year ever!
Poll #791 2008 - The Future of the Snarry Games
Open to: All, results viewable to: All
I would be interested in seeing the following teams for the 2008 Games:
Team Alternate Universe vs Team Alternate Reality* (see bottom of poll for definitions)
84 (54.2%)
Team Canon vs. Team Fanon
50 (32.3%)
Team Romance vs. Team Angst
67 (43.2%)
Team Wartime vs. Team Postwar
42 (27.1%)
There should be THREE (3) Teams, and I will suggest below the Team Names
7 (4.5%)
Other, which I will suggest below
4 (2.6%)
I think the following would be good Teams for the 2008 Snarry Games
I would like to see the Games perform:
Same as 2006 & 2007: Twice a year: author and artist games separate
125 (79.1%)
Once a year, both authors and artists in one big Games
25 (15.8%)
Once a year, author and artist collaboration/tag-teams.
39 (24.7%)
Something else, which I suggest below
2 (1.3%)
I would like the Snarry Games to perform:
I prefer the Authors and Artists:
To be identified. It's all part of the competitive aspect. This has always been a fest for the best of the best.
28 (17.7%)
To be anonymous. Name recognition seems to throw the votes from one team to another.
55 (34.8%)
Either would work for me. I will play or watch regardless.
75 (47.5%)
I am an fanfic author and/or fanartist, and I would be interested in joining this year's Games
Yes
54 (44.6%)
No
40 (33.1%)
Depends on the Teams and/or changes to the current format
27 (22.3%)
I am a fanfic writer, and I prefer to have the following length of time to submit a story to my satisfaction:
8 weeks (2 months) or less
5 (7.9%)
10 weeks (2.5 months) or less
12 (19.0%)
12 weeks (3 months) or less
32 (50.8%)
14 weeks (3.5 months) or less
6 (9.5%)
16 weeks (4 months) or less
8 (12.7%)
I am a fanartist, and I prefer to have the following length of time to submit art to my satisfaction:
4 weeks (1 month) or less
5 (15.6%)
8 weeks (2 months) or less
17 (53.1%)
10 weeks (2.5 months) or less
8 (25.0%)
More than 10 weeks
2 (6.2%)
Fanfic Authors and Fanartists: Would you consider any of the following:
Collaborate with another for a mixed media story/art project (art included in the story itself)
15 (19.2%)
Collaborate with another for a Relay (story followed by complementing art) project
15 (19.2%)
I would consider both
58 (74.4%)
I wouldn't consider either
5 (6.4%)
If you would consider either collaboration as detailed above, would you prefer:
To choose a partner after the Teams are chosen
7 (9.9%)
To have a partner assigned via kinks/squicks/prompts compatibility
55 (77.5%)
Bring my own partner with me before joining
7 (9.9%)
Other, which I will detail below
2 (2.8%)
Other way which I would consider partnering up with an author/artist
Normally, the Author Games run in April/May, and the Artist Games run in Sept/Oct. If we amalgamate the Games into One Big Games, the ideal month would be:
If there is an amalgamated Games, there should be rules to prevent an author/artist from overshadowing their partners. Should we:
Limit the word count per art piece, i.e. One (1) Pic for every 3000 words maximum
9 (6.6%)
Let them go crazy! Graphic art novel, here we come!
71 (52.2%)
There should be maximums AND minimum, so everyone starts with a level playing field.
64 (47.1%)
Other, which I will detail below
2 (1.5%)
I have another suggestion for art per story if the Games amalgamate
On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the the most, how much of a good idea is it to generate more comments per entry by giving out prizes (to be determined) to best commenters/team supporters/cheerleaders?
1 | 16 (10.5%) |
2 | 16 (10.5%) |
3 | 14 (9.2%) |
4 | 8 (5.2%) |
5 | 23 (15.0%) |
6 | 10 (6.5%) |
7 | 14 (9.2%) |
8 | 26 (17.0%) |
9 | 7 (4.6%) |
10 | 19 (12.4%) |