Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "You tend to mumble a lot."

Username: 
Password:    
Remember Me
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
Search by : 
  • View
    • Create Account
    • IJ Login
    • OpenID Login
  • Journal
    • Post
    • Edit Entries
    • Customize Journal
    • Comment Settings
    • Recent Comments
    • Manage Tags
  • Account
    • Manage Account
    • Viewing Options
    • Manage Profile
    • Manage Notifications
    • Manage Pictures
    • Manage Schools
    • Account Status
  • Friends
    • Edit Friends
    • Edit Custom Groups
    • Friends Filter
    • Nudge Friends
    • Invite
    • Create RSS Feed
  • Asylums
    • Post
    • Asylum Invitations
    • Manage Asylums
    • Create Asylum
  • Site
    • Support
    • Upgrade Account
    • FAQs
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Interest
    • Search Randomly

D.J. ([info]djin7) wrote in [info]snarry_games,
@ 2008-01-03 23:05:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:mod post, polls

The Future of the Snarry Games Poll
Welcome, Snarry Games fans and participants! The Mod Squad has been in deep discussions about the logistics, ideas and possibilities for the 2008 Games.

We wish to always strive to make our fest better, and improve every year based on the feedback we receive from both the Champions and the Spectators. This year, we are considering even more changes. We are considering some major ones, my friends. But first, we wish your feedback.

Please take a few moments to fill out our poll, and feel free to comment with any and all concerns or ideas to help us improve and make our 2008 Games the best year ever!




Poll #791 2008 - The Future of the Snarry Games
Open to: All, results viewable to: All

I would be interested in seeing the following teams for the 2008 Games:

View Answers

Team Alternate Universe vs Team Alternate Reality* (see bottom of poll for definitions)
84 (54.2%)

Team Canon vs. Team Fanon
50 (32.3%)

Team Romance vs. Team Angst
67 (43.2%)

Team Wartime vs. Team Postwar
42 (27.1%)

There should be THREE (3) Teams, and I will suggest below the Team Names
7 (4.5%)

Other, which I will suggest below
4 (2.6%)

I think the following would be good Teams for the 2008 Snarry Games

View Answers

I would like to see the Games perform:

View Answers

Same as 2006 & 2007: Twice a year: author and artist games separate
125 (79.1%)

Once a year, both authors and artists in one big Games
25 (15.8%)

Once a year, author and artist collaboration/tag-teams.
39 (24.7%)

Something else, which I suggest below
2 (1.3%)

I would like the Snarry Games to perform:

View Answers

I prefer the Authors and Artists:

View Answers

To be identified. It's all part of the competitive aspect. This has always been a fest for the best of the best.
28 (17.7%)

To be anonymous. Name recognition seems to throw the votes from one team to another.
55 (34.8%)

Either would work for me. I will play or watch regardless.
75 (47.5%)

I am an fanfic author and/or fanartist, and I would be interested in joining this year's Games

View Answers

Yes
54 (44.6%)

No
40 (33.1%)

Depends on the Teams and/or changes to the current format
27 (22.3%)

I am a fanfic writer, and I prefer to have the following length of time to submit a story to my satisfaction:

View Answers

8 weeks (2 months) or less
5 (7.9%)

10 weeks (2.5 months) or less
12 (19.0%)

12 weeks (3 months) or less
32 (50.8%)

14 weeks (3.5 months) or less
6 (9.5%)

16 weeks (4 months) or less
8 (12.7%)

I am a fanartist, and I prefer to have the following length of time to submit art to my satisfaction:

View Answers

4 weeks (1 month) or less
5 (15.6%)

8 weeks (2 months) or less
17 (53.1%)

10 weeks (2.5 months) or less
8 (25.0%)

More than 10 weeks
2 (6.2%)

Fanfic Authors and Fanartists: Would you consider any of the following:

View Answers

Collaborate with another for a mixed media story/art project (art included in the story itself)
15 (19.2%)

Collaborate with another for a Relay (story followed by complementing art) project
15 (19.2%)

I would consider both
58 (74.4%)

I wouldn't consider either
5 (6.4%)

If you would consider either collaboration as detailed above, would you prefer:

View Answers

To choose a partner after the Teams are chosen
7 (9.9%)

To have a partner assigned via kinks/squicks/prompts compatibility
55 (77.5%)

Bring my own partner with me before joining
7 (9.9%)

Other, which I will detail below
2 (2.8%)

Other way which I would consider partnering up with an author/artist

View Answers

Normally, the Author Games run in April/May, and the Artist Games run in Sept/Oct. If we amalgamate the Games into One Big Games, the ideal month would be:

View Answers

May
18 (13.7%)

June
30 (22.9%)

July
42 (32.1%)

August
41 (31.3%)

If there is an amalgamated Games, there should be rules to prevent an author/artist from overshadowing their partners. Should we:

View Answers

Limit the word count per art piece, i.e. One (1) Pic for every 3000 words maximum
9 (6.6%)

Let them go crazy! Graphic art novel, here we come!
71 (52.2%)

There should be maximums AND minimum, so everyone starts with a level playing field.
64 (47.1%)

Other, which I will detail below
2 (1.5%)

I have another suggestion for art per story if the Games amalgamate

View Answers

On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the the most, how much of a good idea is it to generate more comments per entry by giving out prizes (to be determined) to best commenters/team supporters/cheerleaders?

View Answers
Mean: 5.59 Median: 5 Std. Dev 2.91
1 16 (10.5%)
2 16 (10.5%)
3 14 (9.2%)
4 8 (5.2%)
5 23 (15.0%)
6 10 (6.5%)
7 14 (9.2%)
8 26 (17.0%)
9 7 (4.6%)
10 19 (12.4%)



Definitions of Alternate Universe versus Alternate or Parallel Reality are:

An Alternative Universe, commonly abbreviated as AU, is a type or form of fan fiction in which canonical facts of setting or characterization in the universe being explored or written about are deliberately changed. Stories of this type are usually what-ifs, where possibilities arising from different circumstances, decisions, etc., are explored. Unlike regular fan fiction which remains generally within the boundaries of the canon set out by the author, alternative universe fiction writers like to explore the possibilities of pivotal changes made to characters' history, motivations or environment.

Parallel universe or alternative reality in fiction is a self-contained separate reality coexisting with our own. While the terms "parallel universe" and "alternative reality" are generally synonymous and can be used interchangeably in most cases, there is sometimes an additional connotation implied with the term "alternative reality" that implies that the reality is a variant of our own. The Harry Potter books are themselves, a parallel universe with our own reality.

In simple terms?

Alternate Universe means you take our beloved characters and make them zig instead of zag ('zag' being what JKR made them do). For instance, Sirius never died. Or Snape, for that matter. The Harry Potter universe is still there, it has just been 'altered' by means of changing a decision or an event from the actual books.

Alternate or Parallel Reality means JKR's universe is the actual 'real' or 'starting point' reality, and you take the entire Universe and put it on a parallel plane. A non magical one, perhaps based in OUR reality, which is parallel to hers. For instance, Harry is a lawyer and Snape is a librarian. Or Harry is a WWII pilot and Snape is an English spy working against the Germans. Or Harry is a young Jedi and Snape is an officer in the Imperial Army. *g*

Thank you!


Comments? Questions? Concerns? If you do not wish to use the public forum, you can email the mods at snarry [dot] mod [at] gmail [dot] com.


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]the_con_cept
2008-01-04 07:37 am UTC (link)
Um, personally I'd rather not address AU/AR issues since they seem to be a hot button right now and the defintions aren't really agreed upon. I'd rather do something everyone understands and likes, is all, what with all the CANON ONLY or whatnot people out there. But working art and fic in together sounds awesome, if you can get enough artists to work with us lowly, prolific ficcers! I don't know why, but I have the impression that art is much more difficult to produce than fic. *shrugs*

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-04 07:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]the_con_cept, 2008-01-04 04:43 pm UTC

[info]joanwilder
2008-01-04 07:51 am UTC (link)
The collaboration of writer and artist sounds intriguing, but I'm thinking about what I'd do, as a watcher/reader if I were faced with a story that I really liked/thought was well done, combined with art that I didn't like/didn't think portrayed the story well...and vice versa of course. Unless the total score for the collaboration had a break-down, but that would probably get complicated. Just a thought.

There's also a timing issue I wonder about. I'm looking at this from the writing standpoint, y'know, cause I can't draw worth shit. If I take the 8-12 weeks to write, change things at the last minute (which is known to happen), then where does that leave my collaborator? I guess that the association between fic and art doesn't need to be that precise, but it's another thought I had. I have absolutely no idea how long it takes artists to do what they do, but they probably want as much time as the writer would have.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-04 08:03 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]joanwilder, 2008-01-04 08:19 am UTC

[info]iulia_linnea
2008-01-04 08:32 am UTC (link)
Combining the Games seems interesting, but I imagine that, logistically, it would be more difficult to manage and would require a lot of lead time for collaboration, at least four months' worth. Also, I don't think I'd want to be assigned to an artist; I imagine that nothing would dampen an artist's creativity more than being stuck with a collaborator whose fic she couldn't stand (I can just imagine how many people might drop out because of this issue, which would then become a massive pain for you). Writers and artists should pick their partners—and such a collaborative contest would make an intriguing addition if you introduced a third run of the Games. Truth be told, I'd prefer it if the art and fic Games remained separate contests.

Whether the Games are combined or not, I'm all for minimum and maximum word counts because judging a 1000-word fic against a 10,000-word fic seems . . . not quite right or fair to me; short fic and long fic are such different forms. I love fic of all lengths (and with AR vs. AU as a possibility, I might write a really long fic if asked to participate again), but I find it very difficult to keep up with all the postings when there are loads of (however yummy) novel-length fics to read, and I think that to write effective short fic takes a different skill set than it does to write a well-paced novel, so it would be fabulous to see people writing to their strengths in a Games with length divisions. I think that it would be excellent if you decided that all participants had to write, say, a 5000-word fic (or within a specified range of some word count requirement); keeping the word count requirement relatively consistent would make for easier reading and judging—and it might just encourage readers to comment more and on more fics.

The prizes-for-comments idea seems interesting, but it might backfire—eighty bazillion "Nice job!" comments would really become irritating to wade through. Perhaps there could be a requirement that comments should be substantive if you implemented this idea?

As far as posting anonymously is concerned, I don't think I'd like it because being able to immerse myself at once in the works of writers I've found through the Games has always been part of their charm. When I read a lovely fic in an anonymous fest, I review it and tell myself that I'll return to discover the writer's identity at the reveal, but I don't always do that. I can't be the only one. It's an honor to be asked to write for the Games, and part of that honor is the recognition one receives; to take that away might put off participants—and alienate watchers who don't want to take a chance on, say, a fic with "character death" in the warning by an unknown. I'm always more inclined to read through my squicks when I know, or can find out about, a writer.

All that said, I'm amazed and grateful for the Snarry Games; they are the highlights of my fandom year. Thank you and everyone concerned for all your hard work in making them so much fun. ♥

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-04 08:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iulia_linnea, 2008-01-04 08:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]a_belladonna, 2008-01-04 04:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iulia_linnea, 2008-01-04 05:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]a_belladonna, 2008-01-05 12:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]iulia_linnea, 2008-01-05 12:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-05 02:42 am UTC

[info]jin_fenghuang
2008-01-04 09:04 am UTC (link)
I am all for the anonymous posting of entries. People are more willing to give a look/read according to prompts and not names on that basis. I know that I am guilty of doing it myself i.e. reading that writer's story or worse refusing to even give a certain artist/writer a try due to past experiences. It being anonymous would ensure a more fair distribution of reader/viewers and a fairer evaluation of the entry.

As for reducing the games to one per year and combining art and fic:
I am not sure as to how I feel about that, mainly because I like being able to do both.

Giving out prizes to commenters: I am not sure how one would judge that. It screems wank-potential to me.

(Reply to this)


[info]ex_lilyseyes671
2008-01-04 09:04 am UTC (link)
I love the games and they are high point of my summer.

The idea of partners is intriguing, although it could be worrisome from the 'what if no one wants to work with me?' part of my insecure brain.

The Snarry Games, in my opinion, are the best of the best and I think part of my delight with them has been the anticipation for each of the writers' stories to be posted. I don't think I would have that if the stories are posted anonymously.

Thank you!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jin_fenghuang, 2008-01-04 09:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ex_lilyseyes671, 2008-01-05 02:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jin_fenghuang, 2008-01-05 02:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]accio_kilt, 2008-01-05 05:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ex_lilyseyes671, 2008-01-05 08:06 am UTC

[info]daughter_moon
2008-01-04 10:57 am UTC (link)
When I'm writing, I don't mind too much how long the time is, so long as there is time to work around stuff like exams which can cause problems. I do like the longest amount of time possible, but it rarely causes me to back out of challenges.

I think it would be a good idea to maybe reduce the number of participants. It has been impossible to keep up with the number of fics and art being posted. I've never managed to read everything, and I still regret that.

(Reply to this)


[info]painless_j
2008-01-04 11:55 am UTC (link)
I like the idea of AU/AR teams, as long as you provide the definition. It would do good, IMO, to word it in a more conversational way, such as "We will consider AU..." instead of "AU means..."

I firmly believe there should be one basis for the division of teams. I.e. if you make it AU/AR, then there shouldn't be a third team Fanon or Wartime because such classification defies logic. AU/AR/Canon would be fine though.

I don't like the idea of mixed art/fic games. I realise that two games a year is much more work but it's much more joy for fandom too, IMO. Besides, I second RaeWhit's wariness: what if I like the art but hate the story? Or vice versa.

Anon posting is fine by me, as is not anon :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-05 04:04 am UTC

[info]klynie1
2008-01-04 12:36 pm UTC (link)
I love the idea of doing the games anonymously. Perhaps it's because I don't have a big fan base, but I'm finding that my fics are doing much better in anonymous fests as opposed to the fests where the names are posted. I think it levels the playing field quite a bit and allows stories to be judged on merit, not on reputation (though please don't think that I'm trying to say that reputation isn't based on merit - it is, it simply carries a great deal of additional weight of its own). And I agree with [info]jin_fenghuang's point: readers will know who is participating in the Games already, just not who is writing which story (though I'm sure that many will be able to guess).

Another great idea: having maximum and minimum limits on stories. Perfect. Again, levels the playing field.

I love the writer/artist collaboration idea and I'm entirely comfortable with having them assigned. If it's a true collaboration, there's no reason that the writer and artist can't agree on how to approach the work, so I don't foresee the difficulties of having an artist who absolutely hates what they have to create artwork for. Would there be any reason that a writer would presume that their story is more important than artwork created to complement it? (Of course, in RL, I'm an artist; my only creative writing is HP fanfiction, so I'm quite biased. *g*) It may also help to minimize drop-outs, since in addition to the overall team support, there would be partner support as well. I'd be worried if there wasn't some formal manner of partner assignment, though, since I don't have the relationships that many writers and artists have in the community. I know which two artists I adore and would personally like to approach, but I also imagine that they would be approached by many other writers, too, and that logically, the artist would choose someone s/he knows well as opposed to a little-known writer.

I'm so glad that these discussions are taking place and that the Games are still alive! They're a huge amount of work, and I was worried that after DH and the end of Smutmas, the Games might also have taken their last curtain call. Thank you all so much!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]klynie1, 2008-01-04 12:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-04 04:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iulia_linnea, 2008-01-04 06:08 pm UTC

[info]torino10154
2008-01-04 12:41 pm UTC (link)
I voted for the 'classic' angst vs. romance. I do like the idea of AU vs. AR but I have come across people that really dislike AR and I wondered if it would be a fair fight.

I also prefer keeping art and fic separate. Although there aren't as many fests over the summer, all the Christmas ones have shown it's hard to keep up with too much at once.

I can see the benefits of anonymous works (some stories certainly must get more attention based on the author) but either way is fine.

I picked May for the month of big games, although perhaps (late) August would be better as people would have all summer to write. I think it's just difficult when so many people are away over the summer-early August is often dead.

Limiting art/fic-I said no, let them go nuts. Every time I consider limits I think of the really long fics, especially from the Snarry Games, and wince at the idea they would have been cut short. If someone's muse is taking them on a long journey, it's hard to want to clip their wings.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-04 04:19 pm UTC

[info]stellamoon
2008-01-04 01:04 pm UTC (link)
I have concerns about offering any sort of recognition for comments. It seems to me that it would become too much of a high school popularity contest....and fandom is sometimes too much like that already. I understand wanting to drum up more participation that way, but I don't think it would work out for the best.

As for collaboration: I'm very intrigued by the idea. I don't think people should choose their partners because that isn't really fair, and everyone wants the same 2 or 3 writers and the same 2 or 3 artists for their partner. Plus, what if no one likes me? On the other hand, though, I wouldn't want to be paired with a writer who might let me down fic-wise, and then my art is judged along with their fic. Tag-teaming alleviates that problem by minimizing the effect of pairing author/artist. Plus, I worry about the drop out rate and how that would affect partners. You know it happens in every fest, so you'd need to plan for it.

As for the teams, I'm going to suggest the same thing I did last year: Team Romance, Team Angst, Team Crack or Humor. I also would like to see individual medals as well as team medals. However....see my first paragraph about popularity contests! Yeah, it probably wouldn't work.

I said in the poll that I'd want 8 weeks lead time, but I'd need that time AFTER some collaboration. So the writer would already have had to provide a starting point for my ideas. And I realize the writer doesn't have their whole story mapped out on the day they sign up. So, lots of lead time would be necessary if we are collaborating. But that really shouldn't be too difficult since we'd be only having the Games once per year instead of twice, anyway.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]stellamoon, 2008-01-04 01:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-04 04:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stellamoon, 2008-01-04 05:37 pm UTC

[info]empathic_siren
2008-01-04 01:14 pm UTC (link)
I love the idea of a collaborative fest. I think it has the potential, though, to be amazing or problematic. Either way, though, it would be exciting.

And I also like the idea of an anonymous fest. I think there's a certain freedom in anonymous posting (for the writer, I mean). You get to play a bit more than you might otherwise do consciously.

(Reply to this)


[info]who_la_hoop
2008-01-04 01:22 pm UTC (link)
I'm not sure AV vs AR would be, as torino10154 says in the comment above - a fair fight. I think you either love or hate AR - so this might skew the voting.

I like the idea of anon posting, because it puts newbies to the fandom on the same footing as BNFs when it comes to the attention the fic/art gets. But on the other hand, if I read a story I like, it's good to know who the author is so I can read more of their stuff before I get overwhelmed by fest-fic and forget.

I think limits put a crimp on creativity... I see the point, but if I have a prompt I want to go with it as far as it takes me. That might be 5K or it might be 25K. If there's a limit then the fic would suffer, I think.

I love the idea of author/artist collaboration - although I think it might prove a little tricky in practice, speaking as a writer who always sails close to the wind when it comes to deadlines, and I'm sure I'm not the only one...

(Am new-ish to H/S although not to fandom, and am looking forward to the next games!)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-04 04:27 pm UTC

[info]auctasinistra
2008-01-04 01:48 pm UTC (link)
I couldn't really answer the first because I'm not sure what the idea separation is. If I get any great brainstorms I'll come back and comment.

Also, I really like the idea of anonymous posting, for some reason - but it's not for the reason you offer. :-) I don't think, for instance, our teams were divided up in such a way that any BNFs (or, I suppose, much-loathed writers) were heavily weighted to one side or another, so it's hard to imagine that having an effect (after all, our foes had Delta and we still won! ;-)). But the anonymous thing - I like the openmindedness that brings to my own reading and, at least so I hear, to others' as well.

(Reply to this)


[info]auctasinistra
2008-01-04 01:49 pm UTC (link)
"Idea separation"?! And I'm stone sober. That's "ideal" separation. I had no problem with prewar/postwar, but ... I don't know ... they all have something to recommend them.

(Reply to this)


[info]auctasinistra
2008-01-04 01:55 pm UTC (link)
OK, now I've read the definitions of AU and AR and I'm still confused. I think it's only because you've used AR to define what I think of as AU - a different existence. Would these definitions mean that if I write the usual post-DH story and bring Snape back (still as the potions master Death Eater etc.), that's now AU? But if I write him as a cowboy and Harry as a sheepherder in the old west (what I think of as AU) that's AR? I just want to be clear on your definitions (I figure I don't have to agree with them, just understand them *g*)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-04 04:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]auctasinistra, 2008-01-05 01:14 am UTC

[info]auctasinistra
2008-01-04 01:58 pm UTC (link)
I have to second [Unknown LJ tag] on being uneasy re: collaboration. For me, at least, it's just asking for dissatisfaction, either from the writer with the artist or from the artist with the writer - particularly if they're randomly paired up. For my part, there are only a few artists out there whose still I like - and that's NOT to say "Oh, the others aren't WORTHY to illustrate my work!", just that there's an increased risk of real disappointment on either side if we're paired with someone whose work doesn't speak to us.
My 2 cents.

(Reply to this)


[info]auctasinistra
2008-01-04 02:04 pm UTC (link)
OK. I'm not well. For "whose still I like" read "Whose STYLE I like"

Sheesh.

(Reply to this)


[info]undunoops
2008-01-04 02:08 pm UTC (link)
I'm pretty much rubbish at polls, I can never make a decision. But I will say that the combined artist/writer idea assumes that the artist will illustrate a writer's work and not the other way around.

Is that too much of an assumption?

Just throwing it out there... ;-)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-04 03:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]iulia_linnea, 2008-01-04 06:02 pm UTC

[info]eeyore9990
2008-01-04 02:49 pm UTC (link)
OHHHH! Collab would be AWESOME! Also, thank you, from the very bottom of my heart, for the definitions for AU/AR. I've always used them interchangeably, thinking they meant basically the same thing. I learn something new every day in fandom, I swear! YAY GAMES!!!

Also, I chose 10 weeks, but I must admit I wavered back and forth between that and 12 weeks. We all, I think, try our very best for the Games. Last year I spent every waking moment on my fic and still felt that there were tweaks that could have been made to make it OMG BETTER!! MUST BEAT TEAM POST-WAR!!! Yes, I have competitive spirit, why do you ask? :P

I adore the idea of collabing (could you tell?), but it won't stop me from loving the hell out of the Games if the mods decide against it. *nods*

Hahaha, I can't wait for the Games to start!!! *bounces* This is like a Venti Late with a triple shot! Wheee!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-04 04:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aliciamasters, 2008-01-05 02:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eeyore9990, 2008-01-05 02:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aliciamasters, 2008-01-05 02:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-05 02:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eeyore9990, 2008-01-05 02:33 am UTC

[info]vain
2008-01-04 02:53 pm UTC (link)
I find the idea of AU vs AlR to be really exciting, but the collab of artists and writers worries me a little. I don't know a lot of artists and my writing process tends to be tumultuous at best. Both times I participated, I scrapped no less than 5 stories through the process.

I think the idea is clever, but as a hopeful participant, I'm a little wary.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-04 04:00 pm UTC

[info]a_belladonna
2008-01-04 04:35 pm UTC (link)
I like that Snarry Games isn't anonymous. There are so many anonymous fests and exchanges, I like that with this one you can link to your entry from the moment it's been posted and show what you made. I don't really see the point in it being anonymous, since there's really only one receipient...the Snarry part of fandom. But perhaps it's because I've only participated as an artist, and we really can't be that anonymous. ;)

Collaborations could be fun, though I've never tried collaborating with anyone before. But as I said in a reply to [info]iulia_linnea, then I'm just afraid that the well known artists and authors will be picked really fast or be the ones everybody wants to team up with, and then us not so well known will be viewed as a kind of left over "second option".

(Reply to this)


[info]umbrus
2008-01-04 05:45 pm UTC (link)
OH MY GOD! excuse me while I go and squee over the possibility of a collab...

um... anyways I love the idea of doing a fic/art collab though I don't think we should be choosing our own partners. Mostly cause there are people new to fandom and they might feel left out or everyone wanting to choose the same people etc. well, there is also my own insecurities and I'm sure it's shared by others that I won't be able to find a partner cause no one wants to work with me. So best to just pair us up.

Oh and I picked 2 month for the time but if it's a collab that's probably the minimum time we would need. I would like to suggest that we start posting in the beginning of September and give us all summer(3 month) to work on it. I am of course saying this in the perspective of an uni student and will there for have the most time to do such a huge project.

(Reply to this)


[info]uniquewonders
2008-01-04 05:59 pm UTC (link)
To clarify: anonymous only if the names are revealed at the end of the games.

Collabs sound interesting only if fanart inspires fanfic and vice-versa. Otherwise, it means fanart is only there to illustrate a story, which is a great thing but not all what fanart can be for. The choice could be left to the writers and artists, of course. And I hope comics would be allowed. I'd really like to see more. Also, one should be able to vote for art and story separately.

AR vs AU doesn't make any kind of sense to me - I've read the definitions, I swear! - but if that's what people want then *shrug*

About prizes, how would that work? Quantity over quality? Both? How do you measure support?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-05 04:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]uniquewonders, 2008-01-05 02:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-05 08:48 pm UTC

[info]gnomad
2008-01-04 06:05 pm UTC (link)
Collab would be very interesting but a logistical nightmare. What if one of the pair drops out? Do you get a backup at the eleventh hour and have to figure out how to work with them? Would you be judged on your partner's work as much as your own even though you had little to do with the skill of the outcome (e.g., there are only a handful of people I would feel comfortable enough telling them to redo something that was working even if it fit with what we'd planned).

On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the the most, how much of a good idea is it to generate more comments per entry by giving out prizes (to be determined) to best commenters/team supporters/cheerleaders?

Oh god no. It's like your mom bribing your cousin to ask you to the prom.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]umbrus, 2008-01-04 06:27 pm UTC

[info]carawen
2008-01-04 06:26 pm UTC (link)
I'd like to suggest what might be an easier way to look at AU/AR:

What you call Alternate Universe I call Divergent Reality- where the story takes place in bookverse, but something is changed, like a death or non-death, and the story then diverges from canon, while still taking place in the same universe.

And Alternate Universe to me is where the characters are completely removed from bookverse and put in a different universe, i.e. the old west or Victorian England.

Perhaps this would might work better?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]djin7, 2008-01-05 03:19 am UTC

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>


Home | Site Map | Manage Account | TOS | Privacy | Support | FAQs