Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "YEAH, BITCH. SCIENCE!!!"

Username: 
Password:    
Remember Me
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
Search by : 
  • View
    • Create Account
    • IJ Login
    • OpenID Login
  • Journal
    • Post
    • Edit Entries
    • Customize Journal
    • Comment Settings
    • Recent Comments
    • Manage Tags
  • Account
    • Manage Account
    • Viewing Options
    • Manage Profile
    • Manage Notifications
    • Manage Pictures
    • Manage Schools
    • Account Status
  • Friends
    • Edit Friends
    • Edit Custom Groups
    • Friends Filter
    • Nudge Friends
    • Invite
    • Create RSS Feed
  • Asylums
    • Post
    • Asylum Invitations
    • Manage Asylums
    • Create Asylum
  • Site
    • Support
    • Upgrade Account
    • FAQs
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Interest
    • Search Randomly

benicio127 ([info]benicio127) wrote in [info]scans_daily,
@ 2009-07-12 11:41:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:char: harley quinn/harleen quinzel, char: joker, creator: brian azzarello, creator: lee bermejo, publisher: dc comics

Two controversial scenes from the Joker GN
I'm posting these in small part to find out if anyone's up for an Elseworlds/Alternate Universe week. I've got at least three I can share.... (Idk if Lex Luthor: Man of Steel counts as Elseworlds, but if it does, I've got a fourth...)

But anyways... on to the controversy!!

Part One. The LESS controversial scene.




Joker crying. I think this was one of the more shocking scenes for me (granted there were A LOT of shocking scenes).
In this, the narrator, Jonny, is staying at the Joker and Harley Quinn's apartment. He happens to walk past a mostly closed door and glimpses this. (While he sees this, he's telling the reader about a story about his frog. The story ends up  coming full circle at the end of the GN)

Why is this controversial? I for one don't think I had ever seen the Joker shed a tear in comics (and in the funeral scene during the Man who Killed Batman B:TAS episode, his crying is somewhat comical). We have no significant reason why he's crying -- it appears just after Harvey Dent doesn't take his phone calls and he blows up his bar. (And kills a henchman). Was it manic depressive? Was he just really strung out on drugs? Was he upset because Batman had not come out to play with him yet?
Without getting into the Joker's origin, I'm guessing this is Azzarello trying to show us the tragic clown aspect. Here is a egotistical bastard who despite all the glee he gets from murdering and torturing, he loathes himself.

In part, I think, it's controversial because he's on his knees before Harley, and so we see a co-dependent relationship in which she is the rock here. For some that could be unsettling because we almost we see a human, not just a clown or a monster, and (a very minute) potentially a redeemable person. It also shows us that despite Harley not having any lines, she actually IS portrayed as a *strong* character, just not in the traditional *independent woman* nor in the *good girl* sense. She's strong enough to see the humanity of this monster.

Azzarello's Lex Luthor: Man of Steel showed many different sides of Luthor because he in fact loves his humanity. He believes what he is doing is for the greater good. However, Joker's a bit more difficult: he tries to hide his humanity (making up different origins, his attempts on Harley's life [Batman #663, Batman: Harley Quinn], the 180 he did in Going Sane, etc.).

What did you think of this scene? Do you think this was a good way of making him more complex? Could it have been done differently? (Remembering that the fake/real sad origin story has already been done in The Killing Joke..)


And now...

The Rape Scene.





Hoo boy. This scene.
Anyways, while we don't see the actual rape occur, this scene occurs AFTER the crying scene and is after Joker believes Jonny *raped* (for lack of a better term) his trust when he didn't reveal he had a wife (and Harvey found out and used it against them). This woman is Jonny's wife.
On the one hand we feel an almost pity for Jonny for not being able to stop it (go up against the Joker??!); on the other hand, we don't (this is someone he cares about here -- how could he just sit by and let that happen?!).

Thing is, while I doubt the Joker is "above rape," has he ever committed sexual crimes before? (And no, I don't think he raped Babs in TKJ. First of all, it was written by Alan Moore, who doesn't exactly shy away from that kind of thing and would have said so if it had happened; secondly, I think the reason why he undressed Babs was to better show off the wound -- sick, yes, but he's trying to upset her father). But this is technically an Elseworld's tale, so this Joker is different. And if it's "funny" to him, he'll do it. (The joke that perhaps Jonny could have stopped him, but did not....)
Anyways, as distasteful as it was, it does show us that he's completely irredeemable. You get this almost false hope from the crying scene and then comes this.
But was there a better way to show that?
(Granted, IMO, it's not as ridiculous as the almost-rape that occurred in Oracle: the Cure. That was.... well, let's just say it didn't enhance the plot in any way.)


Now I'm a little verklempt. Talk amongst yourselves, people!
The Joker is neither a Joe nor a Kerr. Discuss.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]besamim
2009-07-12 06:08 pm UTC (link)
[nitpick]Having read this GN, I'm not sure this constitutes an Elseworlds story. First, it wasn't marketed as such. Second, it takes place in neither a world noticeably different from the usual post-Crisis DCU (as in JLA: The Nail), nor in the past or future of that world (e.g. Generations), nor a combination of the two (e.g. The Batman of Arkham). Rather, Joker is a self-contained tale that could conceivably take place within normal DCU continuity (or what's left of it), much like the standalone Devil's Advocate.[/nitpick]

Crying Joker: Although we're not specifically told why he's crying, I took it as indicating his sense of betrayal over his criminal colleagues muscling in on his turf while he was in Arkham. Or perhaps just of the stress he was experiencing, trying to get back what was "his." Does it make him more "human?" Only inasmuch as he is a human being anyway (albeit a horrible one) and crying, like laughing, is something humans do. Going by my hunch as to why he's crying, it certainly doesn't make me feel sorry for him within this story. (As opposed to, say, the end of TKJ, or especially Going Sane, where I did actually feel bad for the bastard.)

Rapist Joker: Yeah, there were definitely other possible ways for ol' Jonny to realize that his hero was in fact a monster undeserving of adoration. Not because, as some have argued with reference to the controversial TKJ scene, the Joker is asexual. He may well be so as normally portrayed, but in Azzarello's novel there's definitely a sexual element in his relationship with Harley.

No, it's because rape, whether of women or children, has long been comics shorthand for "complete monster" and apart from the sexism issue that Gail Simone and others have correctly raised, it's a cliché so overused that it simply doesn't "shock" anymore. There are various possibilities for emotional manipulation and cruelty that can establish a character as a "complete monster." Example: in the otherwise poor Joker-origin story "Lovers and Madmen" from Batman Confidential, Joker dresses as a circus clown and asks a little girl in the audience whether he should spray her or her father with "seltzer." When she chooses her daddy, he says something like, "All right, just remember, when you're older and in therapy...you chose daddy." Then he Jokerizes him with gas. That's your complete monster right there: not just murdering a man before his daughter's eyes, but laying the guilt on her. And all without stripping and/or rape.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]blake_reitz
2009-07-12 06:36 pm UTC (link)
I tend to think of it as an Elseworlds because of the characters. Joker, Oswald, Crock, and others are much more "street-level" here, concerned with regular crimes and rackets that are normally dealt with by normal gangsters and thugs in the DCU. One could argue that this GN just shows an off-day (or a mostly Batman-less one). Most out of step is Harley, who is completely unlike the Harley we regularly see. There's also the matter of Joker's glasgow smile.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]benicio127
2009-07-12 06:48 pm UTC (link)
Harley's not COMPLETELY out of step, tho. The not talking?
YES, that's definitely unlike the regular Harley we know.

However, there's still Harley we know in there.
It's clear she's still in love with the Joker, she's still "playful" (her hair styles, her outfits, her grin when she takes out Harvey's goons) and she's still plays a lot of the roles she normally would in regular DCU when she's hooked up with him (girlfriend, criminal partner, tries not to upstage him, etc)

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]abbadie
2009-07-13 08:54 am UTC (link)
I think seeing the Joker weep would be enough to leave her speechless all the same.

There is also another instance of the Joker crying, btw. A Pre-Crisis issue of Brave and the Bold where he teamed up with Batman to find the Penguin's murderer; he actually shed a quiet tear when he saw Oswald's (fake) corpse, and Batman was actually surprised that Joker's mourning appeared sincere -something quite beliuevable since Joker didn't make a show of it. of course, when he found out he'd been had, he later tried to kill Oswald himself.

This was the old Joker and not the uber-Joker born from The Killing Joke and arkham Asylum, but I still think that would make sense for the current Joker; he probably saw the Penguin as part of the weird, wild world of Gotham, and was sad as seeing such a singular character vanish from that world -it's pretty obvious that Oswald ranks high in the weird Gotham underworld, and I can see Joker having a high appreciation for all things weird (I still haven't figured out the connection between penguins and umbrellas, myself).

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]smarmyimp
2009-07-14 10:53 pm UTC (link)
"Gotham deserves a better class of criminal. And it just lost one."

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]benicio127
2009-07-12 06:43 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, see in terms of Elseworlds, I wasn't exactly sure. It's not in regular continuity, but like you said -- it could be.

Anyways, yeah, tbh it wasn't the rape scene that shocked me as much as the crying scene. And I didn't feel it made him weak or made me feel sorry for him as it did make me think once again, he's being human and hates his humanity, but can't help it b/c he's still a human and he needs to eat, piss, sleep, etc.

In this graphic novel, the much better "joke" was when Harley got up on stage and started putting ON her costume to beckon a disloyal mob boss in order to strip him out of his skin. That took way much more creativity than the rape.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]trelas
2009-07-12 06:58 pm UTC (link)
In the same story we had Joker busting in on two unknown elder people living in their apartment and brutally killing them just because. That wasn't exactly creative or "joking", yet I don't see it is a point of critique here.

The creativity of the rape was actually fitting when you look at it from the point of context, how it related to the relationship between the Joker and his biggest fan and what had led to the wife beind in that car in the first place. It was a price, it was a cruel emotional deed, and that was what the Joker was about in the story.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]benicio127
2009-07-12 07:01 pm UTC (link)
True, true.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]besamim
2009-07-12 07:11 pm UTC (link)
the much better "joke" was when Harley got up on stage and started putting ON her costume to beckon a disloyal mob boss in order to strip him out of his skin. That took way much more creativity than the rape.

Motto. And I found the skinning much more shocking than the rape, not only because it (or at least the result) was shown explicitly, but because it's (AFAIK) a rare plot occurrence in mainstream comics. Shooting, knifing, gassing, weird-ray-zapping, bone-breaking--all common, as are rape and child molestation, although the latter two obviously are never shown explicitly. Skinning, not so much. (There was an Alan Moore Swamp Thing story which had a gruesome panel of a man's partially-skinned face. But that's all I can think of offhand.)

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]smarmyimp
2009-07-14 10:54 pm UTC (link)
Well, I suppose you see the aftereffects of it or something similar everytime Jigsaw shows up over at Marvel...

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]trelas
2009-07-12 06:54 pm UTC (link)
But I don't think that rape is being used here as a shorthand for a complete monster, but rather as a part of his actions as that monster, if that makes sense. In the story Joker doesn't resort to rape just for the sake of rape, but it is a part of the awful mind game he plays, ripping apart the man who idolizes him. And given the context of the situation, it goes pretty close to the situation you described.

To degree that rape in itself is automatically sexist as a story vehicle, even if it has been overused to a degree at a certain point of time, is kind of limiting, because there a monsters and villains in the real world who do that. By the same degree I could argue how I never want to see theft in comics, because we've seen so many thieves in them. And yeah, there is a difference and it is all about context, but if I understood you crrectly, you are automatically judgind it's use here without taking that context in to account.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]mysteryfan
2009-07-12 11:35 pm UTC (link)
Example: in the otherwise poor Joker-origin story "Lovers and Madmen" from Batman Confidential, Joker dresses as a circus clown and asks a little girl in the audience whether he should spray her or her father with "seltzer." When she chooses her daddy, he says something like, "All right, just remember, when you're older and in therapy...you chose daddy." Then he Jokerizes him with gas. That's your complete monster right there: not just murdering a man before his daughter's eyes, but laying the guilt on her. And all without stripping and/or rape.

I like this example. It makes the Joker a truly frightening genius instead of a thug who rapes the wife of the guy he's mad at.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Read comments) -


Home | Site Map | Manage Account | TOS | Privacy | Support | FAQs