Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "She gave me a pen."

Username: 
Password:    
Remember Me
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
Search by : 
  • View
    • Create Account
    • IJ Login
    • OpenID Login
  • Journal
    • Post
    • Edit Entries
    • Customize Journal
    • Comment Settings
    • Recent Comments
    • Manage Tags
  • Account
    • Manage Account
    • Viewing Options
    • Manage Profile
    • Manage Notifications
    • Manage Pictures
    • Manage Schools
    • Account Status
  • Friends
    • Edit Friends
    • Edit Custom Groups
    • Friends Filter
    • Nudge Friends
    • Invite
    • Create RSS Feed
  • Asylums
    • Post
    • Asylum Invitations
    • Manage Asylums
    • Create Asylum
  • Site
    • Support
    • Upgrade Account
    • FAQs
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Interest
    • Search Randomly

drsevarius ([info]drsevarius) wrote in [info]scans_daily,
@ 2009-09-13 16:48:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:char: chameleon/dmitri smerdyakov, char: michelle gonzales, creator: fred van lente, title: amazing spider-man

Fred Van Lente update on the Chameleon controversy


I got another e-mail from Fred Van Lente, that he's asked me to post.

First off, while I believe he had the best of intentions, the poster "DrSevarius" wrote me under his real name and asked me a question I thought I was answering in private, to him. He posted my response without my permission and without telling me beforehand it was supposed to be for public consumption.

If he had told me that, I would have, first off, made it clear that I am not a Marvel employee. I am not a Marvel spokesperson. I am a freelancer. I speak only for myself. That is just as true for the following statement as the previous one.

Also, if he had told me that, I may have been less coy about the following "Spoiler Alert". Anyone who cares not to have stuff that's in ASM #605 revealed now should avert their eyes.

Amazing Spider-Man #605, which went to the printer weeks ago, makes it clear that Michelle and Chameleon did nothing more than make out in the kitchen scene in #603.

There was no sex, and therefore no rape.

And I'll simply point out that in the scene in ASM #604 when Peter comes home he has no idea why, exactly, Michelle is treating him differently, only that she is. He learns why-- at least partly -- and he responds, in #605.

Thanks for listening. I appreciate it.

Best,
Fred Van Lente



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]houbanaut
2009-09-14 11:23 pm UTC (link)
Why is that even a question? Because some of us consider the suggestion that all selfish or unpleasant behavior should be made a crime to be naive, unpractical and highly dangerous.

It's great if people are nice to each other, and we should certainly encourage that, but the reality is that some people are jerks, and all of us are jerks now and then. Making it illegal to be a jerk isn't going to change that.

For as much as you and others insist that impersonating a person the victim knows is completely different from other kinds of deception, there is a continuum there. Like, how about the guy who pretends to be, I don't know, Ricky Martin, in order to get groupies? Rapist? How about the guy who pretends to be in the band? Rapist? How about the guy who carries around a book of poetry just so he'll seem deep? Rapist? How about the guy who tells his date "Yes, that's my favorite movie too!"? Rapist?*

Deception is a tricky thing to legislate because we all use it (studies have shown that the average person tells a lie, IIRC, about a dozen times a day). Yes, some deceptions are criminal and SHOULD be criminal. I think we all agree on that. But when you're classifying certain cases of something so slippery as one of the most heinous crimes there is, it's only natural that people should ask "So where does it stop?"

___
* For the record, my gut feeling is that something like the Chameleon scenario - with sex - would be rape, the Ricky Martin guy might be guilty of some kind of sexual assault (though I have no idea whether the actual current law would agree), the guy pretending to be in the band would be a jerk, the guy with the poetry would be doing something tacky but within the "rules of the game" (which men and women both play), and the guy with the favorite movie is probably OK.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Read comments) -



Home | Site Map | Manage Account | TOS | Privacy | Support | FAQs