Daily Scans - It's Not About The Answers: Behind The Mask Of Vic Sage, pt 1
[Recent Entries][Archive][Friends][User Info]
10:37 am [kingrockwell]
![[User Picture]](http://www.insanejournal.com/userpic/8883027/376517) [Link] |
It's Not About The Answers: Behind The Mask Of Vic Sage, pt 1
 Ditko: Vic the Enforcer (pt 1)
In the mid-60s, after his falling out with Marvel, Steve Ditko returned to Charlton, for whom he'd earlier co-created Captain Atom. In addition to working on that character, Ditko created two new ones who would prove to be among the more enduring of the Charlton heroes, and he featured them in the same book. Carrying the title was Ted Kord, Ditko's successor to the classic Fox Features Hero, but it isn't Ted that brings us here today.
It's his backup feature, plotted and drawn by Steve Ditko, with script by D.C. Glanzman.  Debuting in June of '67, though a seven-page story in the back of Blue Beetle v5 #1 (approx. 2 1/3 scans here), Vic Sage was an investigative reporter with a passion for justice.   Vic was best known for the moralistic diatribes he'd deliver on television. Aside from being the character trait most likely to carry over in later versions, it also did very little to endear him to his audience. But more than just preach to the camera, Vic liked to get hands-on with a cause he believed in, and there was no cause dearer to his heart than the cause of justice, to actualize and enforce his moral beliefs. But a man so publicly known needs to divert attention from a face as recognizable as his.  And this is where The Question comes into the picture.  I'd like to say the punning started early on, but this one was really just a one-off. Vic doesn't talk much as he fights, he's direct, focused on his goals. The words his fists can't say for him are pure intimidation.  Taking advantage of his own aura of mystery, Vic strikes fear into the hearts of criminals. The gas may be a simple bonding agent for Vic's mask, but the crooks don't know that. The way Vic tells it, they're likely to think the gas'll strip their faces just like his.  And thus Vic Sage's one-man crusade on crime begins, with his fists falling on glass jaws and his words on deaf ears. He's got his work cut out for him. BB #2, August '67 (approx. 2 1/3 pages)  Now you might recognize this guy from Alex Toth's story in Charlton Bullseye #5, The Banshee. He's just some crook with a flying cape, nothing too special. There are more important things going on here to discuss. Vic, for being such a public figure, is apparently pretty anti-social. This isn't really that surprising when you consider how many people would be alienated by his broadcasts. The real wonder is what he's doing at the jewel exhibit in the first place, unless perhaps he expected a burglary. Second, notice how, where most superheroes would slink away to change into their costumes and take down the bad guy, Vic jumps right on in there without bothering about his mask. He never put much attention into separating his two identities because they are separate at all. There is no double life for Vic Sage, The Question simply allows him anonymity when he needs it. Third, Crown City? Yes. To those not familiar, Hub City was originally home to Ted Kord, but he was moved to Chicago when they crossed over to DC, and Vic's own Crown City was dumped for Hub City. The reasoning I couldn't tell you, those are just the facts as I know them.  Ditko's disdain for high society mixed in perhaps with a little bit of male power fantasy? I can't decide, but it's a safe bet. Where early Spider-Man was a reflection of the troubles in Ditko's reality, The Question is more about the challenges faced by and created from his ideals, and ideals always fair better than reality. All that said, Vic is kind of a jerk.  I don't think I had any commentary for this part, it's just here for narrative's sake or Vic-showing-moral-resolve? The guy Dundo was at the beginning of the story, the soon-to-be Banshee Max was his apprentice, watching him test his flying cape and coveting it. He'd killed him just before the scene with the jewel heist.  Professor Rodor had been name-dropped in BB #1, but this is the first we see of him. Is it perhaps his friendship with Rodor that leads Vic to feel so personal about Banshee killing Dundo and his "rare inventive mind" for the flying cape? Does Vic perhaps see a misshapen reflection of his own relationship with Tot?
 Not one to be left behind in the world of fashion, Vic also has been known to rock a leisure suit. In all seriousness though, it's better for roof-jumping than a bulky overcoat, especially when you've so far failed to keep up with a flying guy.
 Okay. Yeah. Alright. It's clever and it saved their lives, but it will never stop looking wrong.
They fight, this happens.
 If issue one introduced us to Vic, issue two told us who he is. And he's kind of a bastard. Sure, it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy, but Vic is kind of ruthless, and he'll only get more so.
BB #3, October '67 (2 1/3 out of 7 pages, including the one at the bottom of this post) On a building site in the middle of the city, six stories up, one of the owners of 4 Square Construction was found drowned. The others suspect foul play.

 Syd always has it in for Vic's job. There's really nothing to his character beyond that, he's simply one of a number of strawmen after Vic because of his methods and volatility. Also, again, Vic is really kind of a jerk.
Vic goes to do his thing at 4 Square, only to find hostility. When sounds of a struggle are heard, our hero springs into action, and justifies his use of an alternate identity while he's at it. It's kind of funny that his pre-gassed suit is about the same blue as the one he wears in-costume after moving to DC.


The next night, Vic has a lead to check an old salvage yard.
 The really funny thing about The Question is the only thing it really guards Vic from is certainty. It's certainly doesn't alleviate suspicion, and once you suspect it the answer's pretty obvious.
Vic cracks wide the guy's plot and confronts him.
 He laughs like this for two more panels while the guys pleads with him. Stone. Cold
 "The fool only thought of what he could gain--Not what it would cost him if he failed!" More of Vic's thoughts on crime and how it should be dealt with.
BB #4, December '67 increased Vic's share by another page, bringing it to eight (2 2/3 posted) Someone's got it in for Vic Sage, and revenge is the reason! Sending out a baited lead, they find someone else biting.
 The funny thing about this issue is that it illustrates what little the Question identity does for Vic. It keeps the cops off him I guess, though that angle's never explored by Ditko, which is funny considering the kind of rants he could've gotten out of it.
 Rope-belt! Never seen before, and we'll just have to wait to see if it's ever really used again. Interesting idea, nonetheless.
The next day, on Vic's other battlefront,
 He's not making any friends. Some of his not-friends aren't as nice as the picketers, though.
 In the face of classic only-sane-man moralization, of course it's the old man who stands behind him.
The assassin kidnaps Vic's secretary/girlfriend, who reveals his boss, some guy named Nat Kat who went to prison because of Vic's investigations. What does Vic think of Nat's sob story?
 Brrrrrrr. Vic and Nora fight 'em off and escape under cover of a smoke bomb. While Nora gets the news team ready for the story, The Question goes in to catch Nat Kat and the hired killer. He knocks 'em both in a drainage pipe.
 Where justice is more important than life, you'll find Vic Sage.
BB #5, November '68 (2 2/3 of 8 pages) Technically the last Question story during the Action Heroes period, Mysterious Suspense having been released the month prior. We won't let it bother us. A famous art critic comes to visit the WWB team.
 If an image like that has never been printed on the cover of The Fountainhead, then consider me shocked. Boris reacts exactly how you'd expect, and goes just slightly nutty.
 Going a little far, aren't you there, buddy? What could this painting possibly remind you of to warrant this response? Whatever it was, it's bad enough to inspire the guy to send two goons to Nora's apartment to destroy the paintings and possibly beat her up. Vic was on his way out when he saw them, so he beats them up and interrogates them, his way.

After having Professor Rodor's cook up a dissolving spray, Vic runs Boris through the psychological gauntlet by posting copies of the painting all over his apartment and making them dissolve while Boris isn't looking.
 His gambit pays off, as Boris is now such a wreck he's soliloquizing his motives to the painting! So what was it bugging the guy this whole time, anyway?
 Oh come on! If this guy were stuffed with any more straw he'd be trotting down the yellow brick road looking for a brain. It's pretty insulting that the only motive he can have for not sharing Ditko's Vic's view of things is sinister, and due to weakness. No one else can actually believe in what they stand for, eh?
Either that or it's just a dig on art critics not doing art themselves, since the painting is depicting the work of one's hands? Maybe both?
He snaps, pulls out a cane-sword, and decides to go after Nora and the painting himself, with Vic in hot pursuit. He runs into the goons again on the way.
 I thought this was kind of funny for seeing the lingering effects of having The Question beat you up and scare you senseless.
Vic catches Boris just in time to tell him something self-righteous as he holds his knife to the painting. Nora'd already given him the perfect segue when Boris offered to pay her to destroy the painting, telling him he'd have to do it himself (while holding it in front of her, so the knife would easily take her out too!) In the end, the conflict had nothing to do with Vic or Nora, it was all Boris and the painting.
 Vic Sage: Not a therapist.
The story ends with Syd being paranoid that Vic will take him down with Boris even though he'd done nothing wrong or illegal. Hell, about the only thing he had done was agree with Boris about the paintings.
I'll have to cut this off here and split Ditko into two parts, since I've got a 30-hour bus ride to catch in a couple hours. Later this week, we'll continue with Mysterious Suspense #1.

Current Music: Bloc Party ~ "Skeleton" Tags: char: question/vic sage, char: tot/aristotle rodor, creator: d.c. glanzman, creator: steve ditko, publisher: charlton, series: it's not about the answers, theme: objectivism, title: blue beetle
|
|
| |
This is the real Question. Ditko always put a bit of himself in his characters. the Question was the anti socail,perhaps my own worst enemy aspect. Was the Question really about exposing corruption to being about social change or a malcontent who just wanted the howl at the moon ?
Damn, these Objectionists are freaks. Wanting to help people as a sign of weakness. Sometimes trying to help people can be damn near impossible.
I'd like to see an onjectionist character go up against someone who got where he is through direct help from someone else and so he tries to spread it around.
Rather than saying "kind of" etc, I would go all out and just claim that Sage is a ruthless jerk, end of story. The evidence is certainly all over these scans.
" The wind has caught my cape! "
Meanwhile, Vic looks like he's just finished a punch...
Uh, you appear to have posted one of these scans twice - the one where Vic is intimidating the goon with a great big cloud of gas.
Man alive, but Ditko has a grim view of the world. When he's good, though, he's good, and the Question - in whatever incarnation - is demonstrably kick-ass. Still, I'm glad that O'Neil gave him a revamp - anyone THAT abrasive would not be someone I'd want to read about for very long. (Anyway, he kept the core concept, which was 'the hero against the world' - it's just that the world the O'Neil Vic happened to live in was very, very rotten.) The 'diver who drown people on dry land' concept is an interesting one for a villain - not to mention that the old-fashioned diving suit looks suitably creepy and distinctive. It's a shame that this 'Diver of Death' never stuck around - one thing that has regrettably kept the Question on the sidelines for all these years is the lack of good, recurring villains.
... 'Drowns', dammitall. 'Who DROWNS people on dry land'. Edit function, where are you?!
If I had any photoshop skills, I'd take that part of Vic facing the panel when he's telling the guy to pay up and put "Bitch, gimme my money."
And I don't know if that painting's ever been a cover for The Fountainhead, but I do remember something like that being the last frame of the Fountainhead movie.
I think Vic's kind-of a prick in the same way that other dark superheroes are--where their commitment to a higher purpose that they only know makes him appear to be an asshole to everyone who doesn't know what he/she does.
Looking forward to your next installment--The Question's one of my fave superheroes. :D
I might've seen a VHS copy with that cover once. And the thing is we as the readers do know what he's about and still see him as a jerk. Sure, Batman is a jerk sometimes, but I can at least defend him for just poorly expressing himself. Ditko's Vic isn't so easy to do that with, since it's not a problem with the expression as it is with the values at the core. Of course, I've dealt with enough Randites in my time that it might give me a bad reaction to any of them.
And Vic's one of my favorites, too. Even if I may react adversely to Ditko's, he still lays some pretty groundwork here.
To me, the funny part about the Question-vs.-art story is that Ayn Rand's idea of The Only Acceptable Art was, ironically enough, functionally IDENTICAL to Joe Stalin's. Seriously, the art she advocated? Socialist Realism. Theme for theme, composition for composition. Look at the ideologically-correct manly-man painting Ditko renders, and look at this or this or this, and you'll see what I mean.
Nat Cat: "Remember me? I swore I'd get even with you!"
Vic Sage: "For me it was tuesday."
Vic Sage: role model for Bill O'Reilly. |
|