EADA Ben Stone (suspendered) wrote in thedoorway, @ 2013-07-12 15:53:00 |
|
|||
Entry tags: | !network post, ben stone, sam winchester |
network post: ben stone
Filtered to: Sam Winchester
I do not know your inclination at the moment, but should it turn outward, not inward, there are topics I have been reflecting on that I believe are best elucidated speaking with another person. I'll say no more, unless it is of interest to you.Filtered to: Private
It is better to be brief, in these thoughts, than long winded, as this one matter has resolved itself in my head and in my heart. I never sought annulment because our marriage existed, had been real, and the fruit of that marriage will always have made it worthwhile and a marriage that existed. It would not be ethical to seek an annulment back home. I have no intention of marrying anyone else there because I believe in marrying once, as one should.
Here, however, is a New York City in which I have never been born, my wife has never been born, and neither have our families. I have attempted to do research to locate any of them, or to see if they lived, even decades or a century back. They have not. How then could I claim our marriage has happened? In this world, in this new life, our marriage has never existed. Here, it would, then, be acceptable and ethical to marry again. as such, it is ethical to date again.
The issue has standing.