Snapedom

The antagonism between Severus and Harry - intended or not?

The World of Severus Snape

********************
Anonymous users, remember that you must sign all your comments with your name or nick! Comments left unsigned may be screened without notice.

********************

Welcome to Snapedom!
If you want to see snapedom entries on your LJ flist, add snapedom_syn feed. But please remember to come here to the post to comment.

This community is mostly unmoderated. Read the rules and more in "About Snapedom."

No fanfic or art posts, but you can promote your fanfic and fanart, or post recommendations, every Friday.

The antagonism between Severus and Harry - intended or not?

Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
Several different lines of argument are used to explain why Severus is behaving in ways that Harry takes as hostile. One is that Severus had to act this way to maintain his cover as Death Eater: That when Voldemort returned Severus could point to his treatment of Harry as evidence that he remained a true DE and was never influenced by Dumbledore's agenda (and this would be supported by the testament of sons of DEs in his class if needed). A different argument is that Severus has strict and demanding standards (both academic and behavioral) as a teacher and Harry repeatedly fails those, thus bringing upon himself sarcasm, wrath, loss of points and detentions, as the case may be. And of course the argument more common among non-fans of Severus, that from the moment Severus saw the physical resemblance between Harry and his father Severus started taking on Harry his unreconciled enmity towards James (whether consciously or unconsciously).

This relationship becomes mutually hostile and results in Harry and his friends mistrusting Severus time and again - when they thought he was cursing Harry's broom and trying to steal the Philosophers' Stone, in the Shrieking Shack in POA, when they went to the Ministry in OOTP despite having already delivered him what should have been a sufficient warning to the Order and when Harry suspects Severus is a party to Draco's plot in HBP (well, he was in a way, but not how Harry expected). Severus' outburst in the Shrieking Shack ("... I have just saved your neck; you should be thanking me on bended knee!...") shows that Severus was offended by this state of affairs, he really expected to be trusted by Harry.

If Severus' behavior was strategic, intending to act the DE part - why would he expect Harry to trust him? Or is it that since their relationship already had a hostile start (whether because of Harry's conduct as a student or because of Severus' unsettled account with James) Severus decided to use it as part of his justification to Voldemort and the DEs (as we see him do with Bellatrix in HBP)? Did Severus expect Harry, perhaps with the aid of more trusted authority figures such as Minerva or Albus, to see the protection beyond the wrath and snark?

How does Albus fit in? In the early books he contributes to the distrust between the two - in PS he says Severus saved Harry so he could hate James' memory in peace, in POA he blames Severus for the need to make a daring rescue of Sirius. But later Albus reassures Harry that Severus was never suspected with any Dark activity since the first war (GOF), tells him how Severus warned the Order and searched for Harry and his friends in the forest, refrains from mentioning Severus' part in the matter of the prophecy until Harry learns of it himself (OOTP vs HBP) and tells Harry again and again that he trusts Professor Snape (HBP). Yet in OOTP he also says he expected Severus to have gotten over the past enough to teach Harry Occlumency successfully. So did Albus initially think he was supporting Severus' cover story but changed gears when he saw things were going badly? Or was he deliberately preventing the reconciliation of undesired hostility because it served his own plots?
  • (Anonymous)
    Personally, I do not see why a student would NOT trust a teacher in life or death circumstances, just because there is animosity between them.

    I certainly would not assume a teacher would come by just to gloat and watch me be killed, even if he did thoroughly dislike me - especially if doing so meant risking himself in the same 'life or death' situation.

    Of course Harry doesn't 'see' the situation as 'life or death' even tho' it really IS. But from Snape's POV - why would he think anyone would believe he would risk his own life just to be able to watch Sirius or Remus kill Harry? IF he truly hated Harry enough to wish him dead, he could have just waited for Sirius to exit the Shack and make his citizen's arrest THEN.

    I think that's the way Snape would have seen it. So why should he expect Harry to NOT trust him? -- Hwyla
    • (Anonymous)
      You know - just by trying to 'arrest' Sirius - Snape was risking his cover. To the Wizarding World at large, Sirius was considered to be a DE. IF he really HAD been, then Voldy might not have been to happy with Snape for attempting to turn him over to the authorities.

      I suppose the well-known animosity between Snape and Sirius would have been his cover for that one. -- Hwyla
    • (Anonymous)
      Personally, I do not see why a student would NOT trust a teacher in life or death circumstances, just because there is animosity between them.

      I agree with this. Thing is, even if Severus planned for an antagonistic relationship between himself and Harry in order for his actions to look consistent to the DE's and their children, *Harry* still only saw a nasty teacher -- he didn't know Severus was a DE until the end of GoF. Harry had no reason to think that Severus was a DE just based on his classroom behavior.

      (Although JKR does *make* things work out that way. See also: Macnair, whose job it is to kill dangerous animals. It was his job to kill Buckbeak, therefore he was a DE. But as far as *logical* reasoning goes, being unpleasant doesn't mean that someone can't be trusted in life-or-death situations.)

      So in the Shrieking Shack, why *wouldn't* Severus be offended that Harry distrusts him, but is ready to trust the guy who everyone (including Harry) believed was out to kill Harry all year, and the "nice teacher" who looks to be on good terms with the (supposed) escaped mass-murdering traitor?

      I don't think that Severus planned for Harry to suspect him, although he may have planned for Harry to dislike him intensely. Nor do I think that Severus' cover depended on Harry's *suspecting* him, since a good spy wouldn't want to be suspected, after all.

      Lynn
Powered by InsaneJournal