It was ONE post down from the post you were replying to, and I referenced it no later than my SECOND reply to you.
More importantly, you STILL have not addressed the LARGER objections I have raised, so I'll simply copy and paste the exact same text below:
You're STILL on the wrong side of this argument, because you're STILL refusing to acknowledge that a) there are valid, logical, non-"retarded" counter-arguments to Morrison's argument, and that b) you're an incredible hypocrite for demanding civility on the Internet when you go around calling people who disagree with you "retarded" (which you still haven't apologized for).
In short, you cherry-picked the one point on which you thought you could defend yourself, and pretended that I hadn't made any of the other points that I made, presumably because you had no defense against them.
Now, are you actually going to try and defend your blanket dismissals of all of Morrison's critics as "retarded," as well as your use of the insulting term "retarded" itself, or are you going to continue to ignore these points, because you know for a fact that, by the exact same standards of social behavior that you've advocated here, you are 100-percent in the wrong for saying what you did?