> Which you're following yourself by engaging in a strawman argument
No. A strawman argument is when I pretend something you didn't say is your argument.
Here is what you said:
"Please. People on LJ snark at mere FANS who demonstrate the same levels of butthurt that Morrison shows in this text, so why should CREATORS be exempt from the same deserved mocking?
The Internet does not exist to be a "safe space" for comics creators, regardless of how many comms get shut down to prove otherwise."
That is what I replied to. There is no strawman. That is what you said. You are saying that creators shouldn't be treated any differently from fans. But that is not the point as I already said.
Anybody can try an strawman argument. Anybody can pretend someone else said something easier to refute and run with it. But you? You are pretending you said something different than what you actually typed. Now that takes some skill in bad arguing. Don't do that again.