LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY eiredrake)
Can someone explain the significance of swearing in when testifying before the senate? I realize that doesn't precisely fit into the realm of Dark_christian but this group contains a lot of well educated folks and I figure someone knows. I've been doing net searches but coming up with nothing definitive.
There reason I ask is that the Senate comittee heads that are investigating seem to be tossing that aside quite often lately. For example when the oil execs were hauled before the senate the chairmen refused to swear in the guys.
Are they trying to use this as a tactic to protect them somehow?
Page Summary
May 2008
|
Question about Senate
A question...
LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY enkinhou) Bible Idolatry: Placing the Bible above God
LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY sunfell) # We believe the Bible to be the inspired, the only infallible, authoritative Word of God, The Mainstream Baptist site goes into detail about the 'demotion' of Christ in their articles of belief. It might be interesting to note that many of the religious organizations that place the Bible above God also are promoting the Dominionist agenda, too. So, when you examine a church or religious organization, check out their statement of belief. If they place the Bible above God and Christ, reconsider your involvement with them. Statements of Faith
LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY gleef) [This was originally intended to be a reply to this post by thornewilder, but I got interrupted halfway through writing it, and I realized it was of more general use, so I decided to make it a separate post.] Many churches and other religious organizations put forward a "Statement of Beliefs" or similar document. Many of us are trying to figure out which churches and other religious organizations are Dominionist, which are scary but not Dominionist, and which can be either safely ignored or safely worked with. It would be very useful to know more about these Statements of Belief and what they do and don't tell us about the group we want to know more about. This post explores this issue, using the Statement of Beliefs of the Nazarene group linked to in an earlier post. ( Statements )I'd say, chances are they aren't Dominionist (but don't expect sweetness and light out of them), but don't count 100% on that. From a more general viewpoint, I hope I've better illustrated how these Statements can be used as part of an exploration of a group. FCC head of Broadcast Licensing a dominionist?
Project Tocsin has a very interesting article on their blog page regarding godcasters that is in reference to a recent article on the main group in the US coordinating "godcasting" groups, televangelists and the like. (The original Harper's article is available here as part of their "Soldiers of Christ" collection on dominionism.) The convention opened on Saturday evening with an awards ceremony highlighted by the prestigious Chairman’s Award which was something of a paradox as it was “for serving the Christian community in a distinguished and exemplary manner,” but it was given to a nonbeliever, homophobic talk radio host, Dr. Laura Schlessinger, who received a standing ovation. She acknowledged the award by saying she was “just a Jewish girl from the Bronx,” and that “we both serve the same God.” This so far makes two confirmed dominionist-friendly regulators in the FCC--the other being advisor Penny Nance (whose connections to dominionist groups are thoroughly documented here. The really worrying thing, however, is that Roy Stewart is head of the Media Bureau of the FCC (which is the division that regulates both radio and television stations, including LPFM stations). Per the FCC Phonebook he is still employed there, and per the Media Bureau's bureau chief listing he is Senior Deputy Media Chief of the Media Bureau. Roy Stewart is also--notably--Chief, Office of Broadcast License Policy. (In other words, the very guy who accepted the award from the National Religious Broadcasters is the very guy who sets official FCC policy for who gets and who doesn't get an FCC broadcast license.) Disturbingly, the FCC also apparently sees no conflict of interest in receiving awards from dominionist "godcasters" (many of whom are blatantly hijacking LPFM licenses to set up barely regulated "godcasting" networks and would in fact be applying for LPFM and translator licenses from the Media Bureau itself). We may have just found direct evidence of collusion between dominionists (and the hijacking of LPFM licenses) and the FCC itself. I'll keep you all posted. ( References for NRB and dominionist links ) Christian adoption agency changes policy
LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY sunfell) Now this is REALLY getting extreme....
LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY seshen) Dominionists and "Greenwashing"
LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY sunfell) |