Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "Littering and...?"

Username: 
Password:    
Remember Me
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
Search by : 
  • View
    • Create Account
    • IJ Login
    • OpenID Login
  • Journal
    • Post
    • Edit Entries
    • Customize Journal
    • Comment Settings
    • Recent Comments
    • Manage Tags
  • Account
    • Manage Account
    • Viewing Options
    • Manage Profile
    • Manage Notifications
    • Manage Pictures
    • Manage Schools
    • Account Status
  • Friends
    • Edit Friends
    • Edit Custom Groups
    • Friends Filter
    • Nudge Friends
    • Invite
    • Create RSS Feed
  • Asylums
    • Post
    • Asylum Invitations
    • Manage Asylums
    • Create Asylum
  • Site
    • Support
    • Upgrade Account
    • FAQs
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Interest
    • Search Randomly

Ella Claire Gainsborough {Beauty} ([info]bookshelved) wrote in [info]bellumletale,
@ 2010-01-10 13:52:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:beast, beauty

The book is delivered to one L.L. Quinn, in his care for Daniel Brown Webster. Accompanying it is a flash drive (properties tab shows Publishing House information only) with music and the following letter, which is on Publishing House letterhead and is typed in standard computer font. There is no signature at the bottom. The return address on the package, which is wrapped simply in brown paper, is for C. Davis at the Publishing House.



Daniel,

It was quite a challenge to find an appropriate book to send you. Should I send something very lengthy, to keep you busy since you've missed your books so long? Should I send something completely non-sentimental, so you don't further your convictions that I'm running a hostel for homeless felines? Should I choose something modern, as you are a modern writer, but everything we've discussed thus far has been 20th century and earlier? You've mentioned Christie and you've read Shakespeare, O'Connor and some Wharton, but this doesn't help me narrow down a preferred genre for you. Hawthorne and Faulkner, which were my original choices, might make it seem I was trying too hard to impress. While Jane Eyre and Pride and Prejudice might make you not take me seriously.

In the end, I did choose an Austen, but one less commonly read (and perhaps less sentimental, depending on how you read it), written closer to the end of her life, one that speaks to the writer in ways that are often overlooked outside academic circles, but which I find poignant. The book is not new, a fact for which I apologize, but I take you to be a connoisseur of the better-loved books, rather than the new. It's my favorite edition, and it is hard to find, which is why I chose this one instead of buying you the Oxford or Wordsworth.

The music is included because I find it calming to write to. I hope this small package finds you well and home, and I look forward to your thoughts on my little novel.

Claire, who hopes you are being taken care of at home, if you're still unwell.

P.S. You now owe me: One poem, slightly used. One paragraph, entirely new. One novel opinion, appropriately contradictory to my own.
P.S.S. Do you feel I'm entirely too nosy for the well-being of others? I am conducting a survey.


Inside the book, the following notes and passages can be found. All notes are written in a tiny and precise print font, which differs from the script she uses in other writings:

Ch 1: Elizabeth had succeeded at sixteen to all that was possible of her mother's rights and consequence; and being very handsome, and very like himself, her influence had always been great, and they had gone on together most happily. His other two children were of very inferior value. Mary had acquired a little artificial importance by becoming Mrs Charles Musgrove; but Anne, with an elegance of mind and sweetness of character, which must have placed her high with any people of real understanding, was nobody with either father or sister; her word had no weight, her convenience was always to give way - she was only Anne.

- Is it Austen's age that makes her acquiesce to a heroine who isn't carved from perfection? I love Anne.

Ch 4: She had been forced into prudence in her youth, she learned romance as she grew older: the natural sequence of an unnatural beginning.

- Does one who loves so easily give up?

Ch 20: "A man does not recover from such a devotion of the heart to such a woman! He ought not; he does not."

- Truth? Or Austen's own wishes made words on the page. Frederick loves her, yes, and she deserves his love (because I love Anne), but is writing not about truth? Is this truth or fairy tale? The dreams of all women put to ink

Ch 23: "You pierce my soul. I am half agony, half hope. Tell me not that I am too late, that such precious feelings are gone for ever. I offer myself to you again with a heart even more your own than when you almost broke it, eight and a half years ago. Dare not say that a man forgets sooner than woman, that his love has an earlier death. I have loved none but you. Unjust I may have been, weak and resentful I have been, but never inconstant."

- Does a woman love more than a man? NO! Austen seemed to wish this was not the case, doesn't she?

Ch 23: "If I was wrong in yielding to persuasion once, remember that it was to persuasion exerted on the side of safety, not of risk. When I yielded, I thought it was to duty; but no duty could be called in aid here. In marrying a man indifferent to me, all risk would have been incurred, and all duty violated."

- Harris Biggs-Wither?


On the last, blank page, there is this notation:

Persuasion Thoughts

Was Anne a fool?

Anne is delightful. She is Emma and Fanny and Catherine and Elizabeth, had their youths not turned out as they ought to have. This novel has an underpinning of sadness to it that is unmistakable. Yes, the satire is there, thick as thieves, but there is more than setting and snark happening in this work.

It is the novel of a woman who wrote about love and never lived it. It is a cautionary tale, something to learn from.

Was Anne a fool? In this day and age, I say Yes! Of course! If you have love within your reach, you grab it with both hands and hold on with all your might. But in her time period?

Was Anne a fool?

God, but the romantic in me still wants to shout Yes! Yes! from the rooftops. Reality, however, is a different story, at least it was for Anne. She was young, and we make mistakes in our youth. The sadness in this novel comes in that reality tries to crack through the words. It screams Anne wouldn't have gotten him back, and it screams it loudly.

I won't listen.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Re: E-mail.
[info]labete
2010-01-15 12:07 am UTC (link)
Claire,

I know that some writers write what they know. I am not so sure Austen wrote of herself, and it seems a grand, sweeping generalization to say that her pretty tales of romance are the result of personal experience, or even idle hopes. There is something of everyone in tone and what editors call fictional 'voice,' but that isn't to say everything is, in some sense, a biography, or make every Fitzgerald a Gatsby. I divest my novels of any personal information for just this reason, people are too free with the personalities they assign to their heroes, and worse, their writers. I can only imagine what kind of person my readers might think me, if they only rearranged the order in which they've read my work.

I think I will answer your paragraph on my personality. You have what the journalists call timing, Claire, and for that and your own combination of charity and inquisitiveness, have managed to wring more from me than I intended. Here it is, then.

It would be easy to say that I assume the rest of the world to at least be bad off as I am, and they just hide it better. I could go on to tell you everyone has some dark depressing fear that they kick under their beds every night, and that humanity, when not eating its own tail, picks up speed toward the edge of the cliff and the long fall that immediately follows. I would start describing large historic trends in cultural clashes and scientific evolution, and then draw erroneous conclusions about how the atom bomb must mean that man doesn't deserve any of his gifts. I might even wrangle you into a Descartain discussion about how there's no God, just some Pavlovian need for someone to ring the bell and tell us everything will be alright in the end--or misquote a biologist about how our ecosystems are collapsing and how we're hardwired to fight or flight, and not think or talk.

I could do all that. But I won't.

I don't feel that just because there are worse human beings breathing, it means that the kind of person I am, and the amount of pain I cause, is somehow materially lessened simply by comparison. I don't think the larger question on whether or not there is a higher power makes much of a difference on my personal merit (if I had merit, then it wouldn't matter if there was or wasn't, and if I don't, whose fault it is doesn't matter either). You, by nature, are a very charitable person, as evidenced by the fact you're reading this at all, and your doings with that unfortunate former lover of yours and even with that awful bully, Quinn, who it must be absolute torture to work with, if he rages at you the way he rages at my inbox. (I notice you have not told him I was away. Very charitable of you, you see?) You're inclined to think the better of me, but I have known myself longer. Not so very long, but at least longer than you have.

I've pondered the strange behavior of my acquaintance, and I can explain all but the actions of one, a neighbor, who is at least as sour as I am but persists on involving himself in affairs that could only bring him unnecessary grief and, if nothing else, continual disturbances of the general peace. There is one who feels sorry for me, another who convinced herself in love with me, though I like to think she's grown out of it, and yet another who is bored with idle indulgence and here for the show. There was lately another, gone now, and I am waiting for the others to follow her example and find affairs more worth their time. When it gets quiet, I might write again.

Daniel

P.S. As for your stage, I have already given my opinion, unless you have a more specific request.
P.P.S. You're going to need to find another white knight to save you from my more prolific colleagues. Just buy him a few cloves of garlic.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]bookshelved
2010-01-15 02:50 am UTC (link)
Daniel,

Let us begin with the trivial, as I find that sometimes makes hard conversations easier. (Is it strange that I consider this to be a conversation?)

I refuse to concede that Austen is not autobiographical. Throughout her novels there is a spattering of the true instances of her life. She was Elinor to Cassandra's Maryanne. She was Elizabeth to Cassandra's Jane. Her niece was Emma, and she was Fanny. She, herself, was Anne - later in life, after the fates of Elizabeth and Elinor had passed her by. She writes from life, and therefore her life is in her works.

Your novels may not draw from life, but they most certainly draw from you. Do you want to know what I see in your words?

I see a man whose first novel is cockily confident, snarky in its language, the certainty in the words jumping off the page, the intent to irritate clear and crisp. I see a man whose mid-point novel is sardonic and mock-thick. A novel written by someone whose view on life had altered in the interim, who had become derisive, skeptical; a cynic. I see a man whose most recent novel is grim and dark; hopeless and empty. I see Persuasion without the attempt at a happy ending.

And in you, in these e-mails, I see a man who was once charming and elegant, whose words still evoke those days, even if he isn't aware of it; a man brilliant and witty and engaging. And I see a man who hates himself.

I do not think you are a saint, Daniel, and I am under no delusions. Whatever else you take from this, take that fact. I am not a young girl who is starstruck by your fame and your money and your words. I want nothing from you to further my own career. I write to you because I enjoy your company. It is as complicated and as simple as that.

As for your neighbors, I challenge you to ask them. And when they answer, I challenge you to take them at their word, instead of finding all the reasons they must be lying to you - especially the one that confuses you the most. I challenge you to ask him first, before fear takes the urge from you. And if he is at all like you, I recommend you do not let him give you a reason that is outside of himself. Those reasons are always false, in my experience.

When you write again, when it's quiet, I beg the tale of the one who left. Consider this my paragraph and your debt will be fulfilled.

Claire,
who hopes she has not pushed too far with this e-mail, but who is not sorry for the words it contains.

P.S. Clarification, I am asking you to define what constitutes a 'better experience.'

P.S.S. I look forward to your e-mails from the time I hit the 'send' button.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]labete
2010-01-15 03:29 am UTC (link)
Claire,

With respect--and affection, because I like you, you old spinster--that was a bit too far, yes.

The novels are just novels, with my name on them. They are each separate. I'm not trying to start a genre, and certainly not an œuvre. That's not why I wrote them.

I'll send another book along, when I find one.

Daniel

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]bookshelved
2010-01-15 03:55 am UTC (link)
Daniel,

The novels are extensions of the writer, as all novels are on some level. Yours are particularly good, because you are particularly good.

I am sorry to have pushed; it is my way, I'm afraid. But I am not sorry for the sentiments; I stand behind them. I am, however, sorry for any vulnerabilities exposed. I am also saddened by the possibility of not hearing from you in the future.

Remember, I am but an elderly spinster copy editor, anonymous down to the thick taupe of my stockinged toes; insignificant in all things.

Claire

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]labete
2010-01-15 04:00 am UTC (link)
They're not, Claire. They are what they are. There isn't even a 'they.' Each one is... is each one. You can't make me out of them, just like you can't make me into them.

And if you were just that--stockings and spinsters and insignificant things--I don't think I'd like you so much. At least you get a salary, and you do what you do because... you can, I suppose.

Don't be sorry.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]bookshelved
2010-01-15 04:05 am UTC (link)
Of course there is a they, even if it isn't the sense that you mean. They were written by one person, that makes them a grouping, even if they have nothing else in common but the writer, but you.

Can you elaborate on the comment about my salary, so I can refute it?

I am sorry for hurting you with my cobbled together truths. But I am very glad you responded again. I admit to sitting her sadly when I thought you would not.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]labete
2010-01-15 04:09 am UTC (link)
No, I don't want to say anything else about your salary because I don't think I can handle want to hurt your feelings about it. I have a headache. Don't worry, I'll probably keep answering emails until I'm dead. Bad habit..

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]bookshelved
2010-01-15 04:11 am UTC (link)
Can I convince you to tell me what it is that I 'do because... [I] can?'

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]labete
2010-01-15 04:14 am UTC (link)
[Obviously, with the emails so short, they're both sitting at the computer by this time.] Talking to me?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]bookshelved
2010-01-15 04:18 am UTC (link)
I talk to you because I want to. It is as selfish and as simple as that, Daniel. And, moreover, I'm not even being paid to do so at present. I'm sitting at the office, well after my shift has ended, because I like your company - even if your literary theory is sometimes flawed.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]labete
2010-01-15 04:21 am UTC (link)
You like to argue with me, that's all. You might get tired of it eventually.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]bookshelved
2010-01-15 04:26 am UTC (link)
And you might get tired of me and my epic e-mails. There are no guarantees in life, Daniel. Even living isn't guaranteed. I know that right now, in this moment, your e-mails are the reason I refresh my inbox while I'm sitting on my lunch break, and they are the reason I am sitting here, shoes kicked off, in an office that is entirely dark and quiet.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]labete
2010-01-15 04:27 am UTC (link)
You should go home. Are you keeping someone waiting?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]bookshelved
2010-01-15 04:28 am UTC (link)
Are you asking if I'm seeing anyone?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]labete
2010-01-15 04:36 am UTC (link)
That's not what I meant.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]bookshelved
2010-01-15 04:39 am UTC (link)
What did you mean? And you, who is with you at present? Which of your companions?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]labete
2010-01-15 04:40 am UTC (link)
I meant I hope I'm not detaining you from something better. How do you know that someone is here right now?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]bookshelved
2010-01-15 04:44 am UTC (link)
I'm the one who lingered in the hopes you would e-mail back, Daniel. If I was elsewhere, then that would be detaining me from you.

My inference is that you aren't ever left alone; is it an incorrect one?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]labete
2010-01-15 04:45 am UTC (link)
[Pause.] No. That's right. Are you going to draw brilliant assumptions from that, too?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]bookshelved
2010-01-15 04:47 am UTC (link)
Yes, but I can keep them from you if it means you'll panic and determine you can no longer speak to me because of it.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]labete
2010-01-15 04:58 am UTC (link)
[Long pause.] What do you want me to say to that?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]bookshelved
2010-01-15 05:07 am UTC (link)
I'd like you to tell me how much my nosy observations bother you, if they do. You remember I mentioned being told I was too curious recently? Do you share that opinion now?

To not be left alone as you are, I am going to assume you are either an invalid, which I do not think is the case based on mentions you have made; terminal, also unlikely; or a threat to yourself, which is likely possible given your state of mind.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]labete
2010-01-15 05:29 am UTC (link)
It's hard to talk to someone when they're analyzing every word you say to determine your character and it's only a matter of time before they do, and then leave. It makes me want to speed up the process to get it over with.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]bookshelved
2010-01-15 05:31 am UTC (link)
I'm still here, Daniel.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail.
[info]labete
2010-01-15 05:36 am UTC (link)
You just don't know me yet, Claire.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: E-mail. - [info]bookshelved, 2010-01-15 05:40 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]labete, 2010-01-15 05:42 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]bookshelved, 2010-01-15 05:45 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]labete, 2010-01-15 05:54 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]bookshelved, 2010-01-15 05:59 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]labete, 2010-01-15 06:01 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]bookshelved, 2010-01-15 06:10 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]labete, 2010-01-15 06:18 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]bookshelved, 2010-01-15 06:22 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]labete, 2010-01-15 06:28 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]bookshelved, 2010-01-15 06:32 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]labete, 2010-01-15 06:35 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]bookshelved, 2010-01-15 06:39 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]labete, 2010-01-15 06:40 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]bookshelved, 2010-01-15 06:46 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]labete, 2010-01-15 06:47 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]bookshelved, 2010-01-15 06:50 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]labete, 2010-01-15 06:51 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]bookshelved, 2010-01-15 06:55 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]labete, 2010-01-15 06:59 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]bookshelved, 2010-01-15 07:05 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]labete, 2010-01-15 07:06 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]bookshelved, 2010-01-15 07:10 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]labete, 2010-01-15 07:52 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]bookshelved, 2010-01-15 08:12 am UTC
Re: E-mail. - [info]labete, 2010-01-15 04:35 pm UTC

(Read comments) -


Home | Site Map | Manage Account | TOS | Privacy | Support | FAQs