Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "...one good reason to do it."

Username: 
Password:    
Remember Me
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
Search by : 
  • View
    • Create Account
    • IJ Login
    • OpenID Login
  • Journal
    • Post
    • Edit Entries
    • Customize Journal
    • Comment Settings
    • Recent Comments
    • Manage Tags
  • Account
    • Manage Account
    • Viewing Options
    • Manage Profile
    • Manage Notifications
    • Manage Pictures
    • Manage Schools
    • Account Status
  • Friends
    • Edit Friends
    • Edit Custom Groups
    • Friends Filter
    • Nudge Friends
    • Invite
    • Create RSS Feed
  • Asylums
    • Post
    • Asylum Invitations
    • Manage Asylums
    • Create Asylum
  • Site
    • Support
    • Upgrade Account
    • FAQs
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Interest
    • Search Randomly

heartless guttersnipe ([info]parsimonia) wrote in [info]scans_daily,
@ 2009-02-28 19:11:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current music:cat stevens - on the road to find out
Entry tags:char: robin/red robin/tim drake, in-joke: context is for the weak

Context is for the WEAK
Because I don't think we've had a context-is-for-the-weak post here yet:





Ceiling Robin is watching you masturbate!


(Post a new comment)


[info]morgana006
2009-02-28 06:25 pm UTC (link)
Bats never knock.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]perletwo
2009-03-01 12:14 am UTC (link)
Heck, they hardly ever use actual doors.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]taggerung301
2009-03-07 07:41 am UTC (link)
So I guess riddler could successfully trap Batman in a deathtrap where the only way out was a door

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]ar_feiniel_
2009-02-28 06:39 pm UTC (link)
He's learned from the master.

(Reply to this)


[info]schmevil
2009-02-28 06:39 pm UTC (link)
Has Robin been experimenting with non-prescription medications? Look at those eyes!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]parsimonia
2009-02-28 07:01 pm UTC (link)
Well, there WAS a drug going around in the comic this was taken from...

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]schmevil
2009-02-28 07:02 pm UTC (link)
Does Bats know? Does Babs? I don't think they'd be impressed by Tim pulling a Roy. Oh man, imagine the conversation between Bruce and Ollie.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]parsimonia
2009-02-28 07:06 pm UTC (link)
LMAO! No, it was Cass and Bruce who got accidentally-on-purpose high off it...and they had a nearly-blowing-up-a-bridge-in-the-process fight and jumped into a river, where they hugged and talked it out a bit in a slightly skeevy manner.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]schmevil
2009-02-28 07:07 pm UTC (link)
Oh god, there's Bruce/Cass smut out there, isn't there? *squick*

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]parsimonia
2009-02-28 07:10 pm UTC (link)
Let's just say there is a LOT of subtext in canon, so I wouldn't be surprised.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]schmevil
2009-02-28 07:16 pm UTC (link)
*cries* Have I mentioned how scared I am of the inevitable wave of Silk Spectre 2/Comedian fic?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]kamino_neko
2009-02-28 07:27 pm UTC (link)
'I just realized...there's a damn good chance you're my father.'

'Yeah. Let's go again!'

'You bet!'

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]schmevil
2009-02-28 07:37 pm UTC (link)
Not enough crying. Genuine Sally/Eddie needs lots of dub-con NONOYESYES tears.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]kamino_neko
2009-02-28 07:51 pm UTC (link)
I think I've seen too much STUPID squicky stuff, not just squicky.

('Let's do it!' 'But (I'm/you're) (your/my) (parent/kid/sibling)!' 'Yes?' 'Nothing, let's get naked.' 'It's about time!')

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]schmevil
2009-02-28 07:57 pm UTC (link)
Aaaand this would be why I stay the hell away from incest pairings. I mean, yes there are some squicks that just can't be watered down, but good writing goes along way.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]kamino_neko
2009-02-28 08:13 pm UTC (link)
I actually seek it out sometimes, just because it can be so...bizarre.

(I exaggerate, somewhat in my description above...a lot of the stuff I've run across completely skips the 'but we're related!' part. >_>)

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]schmevil
2009-02-28 08:52 pm UTC (link)
Not gonna lie, I love badfic. I used to run a badfic sporking comm, even. I'm particularly fond of badly written dubcon and BDSM. Hilarity.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]kamino_neko
2009-02-28 09:06 pm UTC (link)
That's what really gets me, sometimes...a lot of this stuff...it's actually not badly done (as far as porn goes)...aside from the 'jeeze, you're related, doesn't that bother you the slightest bit?'

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]schmevil
2009-02-28 09:15 pm UTC (link)
I those fics come about because some people write to satisfy a kink. They aren't necessarily interested in an audience that doesn't share that kink, and they most definitely aren't interested in interrogating their kink.

Hence the strangely unproblematic incest.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]sistermagpie
2009-02-28 09:43 pm UTC (link)
Sometimes I feel like it's *not* about a kink and that's the problem. Because I like incest pairings in fandoms where there's a lot of Gothic trappings in the pairing--or even if I don't like the pairing I can see how it comes out of the show.

What I find creepy are are incest fics about more healthy families--those are the ones I've read where it seemed like they didn't even remember where they were related and I got the feeling the author just wanted to pair those two characters and didn't have a thing for incest. If it's part of the kink it should...you know...read as a kink!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]kamino_neko
2009-02-28 11:49 pm UTC (link)
On the one hand, I can understand that...

On th'other...

I'm just not entirely sure what the POINT is, if the relation isn't being treated like a big deal.

Not having an incest kink, I can't really say how someone who does have one would respond, but...like [info]sistermagpie said, it...kind of seems like...NOT catering to the kink, sometimes.

But if it were for one of my odd, potentially squick-worthy kinks, I'd find the lack of emphasis the aspects that define the kink, and might squick those that don't have it (or even those that do) to be...boring at best, an unfun cop-out at worst.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2009-02-28 07:23 pm UTC (link)
(OZLelila on LJ)

Don't you know there's smut and/or Slash about EVERYTHING? I squelched when I ran across some Robin/Beast Boy stuff not too long ago as that's a pairing I just don't see, but, well...people's minds wander.

But then, that's what we do here at S_D, isn't it? ;->

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]schmevil
2009-02-28 07:36 pm UTC (link)
You know, I've been in the fic part of fandom for over ten years. I've seen it all. Somehow I've maintained my squickability. Of course, there's little that does squick me. Certain iterations of parent/child eroticism just... jesusgodno.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


(Anonymous)
2009-02-28 10:49 pm UTC (link)
(OZLelila again)

Oh, my squickability is quite high. And I agree, incest/kiddie porn is WAY high on the list. I saw a beautifully drawn comic over on Rule34 not too long ago that literally made me nauseous; it was 10-year old Bruce Wayne being "comforted" by his mother. *Shivers at the memory*

But I've been in the fic part of fandom for going on 15 years and seen just about every pairing imaginable. I'm heavy into Star Wars fandom, and I STILL see a Luke/Leia pairing now and again. I guess my point is that if the characters have genetalia, somebody's going to write about them having sex. I go to a con every year that basically a fic con, (they actually still put out paper zines) and run through the new stuff and go "no, no, ick, ew, what were they thinking, no..." (somehow I still wind up buying like $200 worth of zines every year though...)

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]kamino_neko
2009-02-28 11:01 pm UTC (link)
it was 10-year old Bruce Wayne being "comforted" by his mother

...

How bad is it that the fact that Thomas and Martha were killed when Bruce was 6 prevents me from processing this far enough to GET to the squick?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]galateus
2009-03-01 02:44 am UTC (link)
Geez, same here, only with "8 years old." It's just... "Wait, is she a ghost?" "She's not even a proper character!" And what a safe, safe wall of WTF it is.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


(Anonymous)
2009-03-01 09:51 am UTC (link)
(OZLelila again)

LOL! Geekiness rears it's head! Been there.

To be fair, he very well could have only been 8. The part I actually read didn't actually give his age; he was just obviously a young boy. Once Martha Wayne started to take her nightgown off, I stopped reading the text and just glanced at the rest of the art. I should have known better...it was at Rule34.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]masonk
2009-02-28 06:59 pm UTC (link)
Ceiling Robin iz watching you operate...

(Reply to this)


[info]sistermagpie
2009-02-28 07:50 pm UTC (link)
Watching you, and popping in from the ceiling to offer to help!

(Reply to this)

Home | Site Map | Manage Account | TOS | Privacy | Support | FAQs