For an academic debate I welcome well formed argument. Please, be "that guy" all you desire.
Whereas I find validity in your point of view - living in the middle of a heightened state, whether it is political, religious, familial, et alii, can and does typically breed environments rich with strife and conflict - my comment stemmed entirely off the term "activist". Certainly those removed from politics at the time regardless of nationality or affiliation could and did find reason to be dissuaded by living at the epicenter of turmoil. However, it is generally connoted that those wishing to actively drive political change are choosing to be the cause of such agitations.
In contemporary fashion, as a musician I prefer to be at a concert, no matter how ruckus the crowd, than sitting at home listening to an album.
I will state again that these readings are not intended to cover every individual case. They are simply my opinion backed by what historical accuracies are available to me and an education based in both academic achievements on the political histories of Great Britain as well as an upbringing in the county in question. Additionally, I am naturally drawn to the fray, though reiterating again, it is not everyone's cup of tea.