InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "MUSHROOM MUSHROOM"

sherlock holmes (assertion) wrote in valarcomm,
@ 2016-01-18 22:50:00

Entry tags:

jemma simmons, sherlock holmes

texts to jemma simmons

> Greetings, Miss Simmons.
> I've a very important question for you before I delve into the several others I presently possess.
> Do you have an overall disdain for textspeak?

(Post a new comment)

	needanewplan 2016-01-18 03:00 pm UTC (link)
	>>Well hello, Mister Holmes >>I'm not exactly fond of text speak >>But I will do my best to answer your questions (Reply to this) (Thread)

	assertion 2016-01-20 03:22 pm UTC (link)
	> Very well. > I will refrain given your predisposition. > You have been in Orange County a very long while, as I understand it. > Do you 'Dream'? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	needanewplan 2016-01-20 03:24 pm UTC (link)
	>>I appreciate it >>Yes, nearly a year now >>And I do >>Though I have not for a couple of months now (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	assertion 2016-01-20 03:35 pm UTC (link)
	> I see. > What is your scientific explanation of these dreams? > Have you acquired a reasonable hypothesis? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

needanewplan
2016-01-20 03:40 pm UTC (link)

>>I don't have one
>>Which is understandably beyond frustrating
>>I know my personal experiences and those of the people I care for
>>But nothing to even begin to form a scientific explanation
>>It's not magic
>>I may be more open to such things as existing but not as a reason

>>If you like, I can show you the research I've managed on different events which have happened
>>Even if they have provided no information on the how or why of this place

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	assertion 2016-01-20 03:45 pm UTC (link)
	> Something concrete, however far-fetched it may be, would be ideal. > When you have the chance, I would be keen on reading it. > I did not believe in the Dreams. > My position has now, however, become somewhat malleable. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	needanewplan 2016-01-20 03:48 pm UTC (link)
	>>Of course >>I will let you know when I can come by with my current research >>I can certainly understand that >>For me it was once things started to show up that I was more open to them >>Bleed over of injury and illness also make it more believable >>I trust you are well even if looking for answers? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	assertion 2016-01-25 12:02 pm UTC (link)
	> It is absolutely no rush. > It is the former bleed over that made me question my otherwise rigid stance. > I am well, yes. > I am in the business of searching for answers. > This is perhaps a mystery that will continue to elude me, however. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	needanewplan 2016-01-25 12:03 pm UTC (link)
	>>That does tend to be the case more often than not >>I am glad to hear that >>Sadly that very well may be the case (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	assertion 2016-01-25 12:08 pm UTC (link)
	> That something so profound has continuously occurred in one concentrated corner of the world (cont.) > (to our working knowledge) and is written off as a narcotics-induced hallucination gravely worries me. > Then, I am reminded humanity is very easily duped. > Thank you, Miss Simmons, for your assistance. > You remain an anomaly of our kind. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	needanewplan 2016-01-25 12:22 pm UTC (link)
	>>People find it easier to believe than the alternative >>Of course >>If you ever have any questions I will always do my best to answer >>Thank you (Reply to this) (Parent)