Re: Pearlette and ...
(Anonymous)
That's not really the point, although, yes, Pearlette should have done without the needling.
Sylvana, I was responding to BEING needled. If all this was a mere matter of differing opinions, there would be no problem. But I was accused by Duj of ignoring the text and then told I 'had no problem with child negligence'. That kind of needling/baiting is totally unncessary: I quite agree.
… and accusing others of intolerance merely because they persist in holding views different to your own is the height of intolerance and debate-stifling.
That’s right, Duj. Insinuating that someone who disagrees with you has 'no problem with' child abuse and cruelty to cats certainly comes under the umbrella of ‘intolerance and debate-stifling’.
I don't object to you disagreeing with me about Lily. But I won't tolerate personal attacks.
-- Pearlette
Sylvana, I was responding to BEING needled. If all this was a mere matter of differing opinions, there would be no problem. But I was accused by Duj of ignoring the text and then told I 'had no problem with child negligence'. That kind of needling/baiting is totally unncessary: I quite agree.
… and accusing others of intolerance merely because they persist in holding views different to your own is the height of intolerance and debate-stifling.
That’s right, Duj. Insinuating that someone who disagrees with you has 'no problem with' child abuse and cruelty to cats certainly comes under the umbrella of ‘intolerance and debate-stifling’.
I don't object to you disagreeing with me about Lily. But I won't tolerate personal attacks.
-- Pearlette