Snapedom

If we carry through on the racism/prejudice equivalency...

The World of Severus Snape

********************
Anonymous users, remember that you must sign all your comments with your name or nick! Comments left unsigned may be screened without notice.

********************

Welcome to Snapedom!
If you want to see snapedom entries on your LJ flist, add snapedom_syn feed. But please remember to come here to the post to comment.

This community is mostly unmoderated. Read the rules and more in "About Snapedom."

No fanfic or art posts, but you can promote your fanfic and fanart, or post recommendations, every Friday.

If we carry through on the racism/prejudice equivalency...

Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
If we carry through on the racism/blood prejudice equivalency... 

was James Potter a racist of the worst order? Think back to the Snape's Worst Memory scene.  Remember when Lily asks James just what Severus ever did to him?  The reply from James was, "it's more the fact that he exists if you know what I mean. . ."    Most people, IMO, interpret that to mean the bully's "natural" prey instinct had kicked in, but what if we are going to carry through on the claim that anti-Muggle and Muggleborn prejudice is equivalent to racism. 

These boys were born in 1960, and it was not until 1967 that Loving v. Virginia struck down anti-miscegenation laws in the US.   Ahhh, you say, stop trying to apply American standards and baggage to Brits.  So let's look at Rowling's model:  Anti-miscegenation laws were enforced in Nazi Germany.  They  were also enforced in South Africa between 1949 and 1985.   So....was Snape's existence the result of a violation of the law?  How many half-bloods did we see in the Marauder era?   And even if it's not illegal, was it considered shameful by a large segment of the Wizarding population?  No, it wasn't by Harry's time, but mores change.  Is that part of what James meant when he said it was that Severus existed?  He added "if you know what I mean", which is the nod-nod, wink-wink of a racist, roughly equivalent to the loaded statements characters in Seinfeld used to make about homosexuals,  always followed up with the tag line:  "Not that there's anything wrong with that."  (nod, nod, wink, wink).  It's also the shrug and eye-roll that accompanies many whites'  comments about Native Americans, with the apparent idea that they can imply the most outrageously racist things, and it doesn't count  because they trail off towards the end.  But their buddies all know what they meant, so they're covered either way.

I can almost hear the howls of outrage.  ;-)  You idiot, they say, he was married to LILY, the ultimate poster child for Muggle-borns.  But...

How many friends did James Potter have who were not pureblood?  I mean friends, as opposed to hangers-on or sycophants.   We know he was married to Lily, obviously.  Which means that he made an exception for his own behavior, not uncommon at all for bigots.  And yes, he "befriended" Lupin the werewolf in school.  But how much did he do after school, when Lupin was not a dorm-mate and, later, a prefect in a position to choose between admiring them or blowing the whistle on Sirius and him?   Rowling said in her interviews post-DH that James was independently wealthy, which allowed James and Sirius not to worry about having jobs, so they could "work" for the Order full-time.  Note that she does not include Lupin in James' largesse, which according to her extended to James' wife and Sirius, who just happened to be pure-blooded.

  • Re: Good gay subtext and disallowed gay subtext

    I'm much more cynical than you about Rowling's "announcement" that Dumbledore was gay. Look at the timeline: on her post-DH US tour, she went to LA where, according to some reports, she faced a few rather pointed questions. Then she went to New Orleans, where the audience audibly groaned at her when she slammed Snape and her chemistry teacher. I think that shook her badly. So what does she do? She heads to New York, where she gets the question: Has Dumbledore ever loved? As you note, she went out of her way to say that she's always thought of Dumbledore as gay! And then says his love was his great tragedy. And then later adds that will give those intolerant critics something more to dislike about the books. That last bit is the most telling.

    It all reeks of a reaction to the criticism she had faced in her tour to that point, and a clear attempt to inoculate herself. So now, if you are a critic and can "prove" you are not a religious nut who thinks she's promoting witchcraft, well then, you must be a homophobe! Don't forget that Rowling has repeatedly admitted to browsing to web to read about herself and the books. And before her big announcement about Dumbles, there was quite a bit of chatter that she was going to be surprised because quite a few non-hyper-religious people were finding lots of reasons to dislike Book 7 other than the tired old "promotes witchcraft" canard. Of course, that all took a nosedive after the announcement, IMO because few people wanted to be accused of anti-gay bigotry.

    And in the meantime, she's covered herself by taking the most sexless character available and proclaiming them gay, all the while she has determinedly "rescued" Sirius Black from the slashers. Personally, I'm not gay and I don't care if her characters are. It's the hypocrisy and cold calculation about politics and her book sales that I find so distasteful.
Powered by InsaneJournal