You're making a lot of assumptions about what I understand and what my opinions are. As far as I can see, those assumptions are incorrect.
As far as approaching it any other way, your last sentence was a good start. As I said, there's a difference between "the POV of a person" and "the way everyone should see this." The emphasis is on "a person," rather than all people. I'm not saying you're wrong for finding it offensive. I am saying that you're wrong for saying that I didn't understand why you were in a rage, based on my not demonstrating that I'm also in a rage.
Remember, I made a short post about one aspect of the article. It wasn't meant to be a complete critique. It seemed that the things about the article you found offensive were already being discussed in detail, so I didn't see the need to add to that. I did think it was an interesting irony that underneath everything, there was some good advice there. I thought there might be fodder for an interesting discussion about what separated the good advice from the ugly sexism, why it was put forward in those terms, and maybe even the reasons why people do cheat on their spouses. If we were talking about something contemporary and widely-spread, denouncing it vehemently would be a more appropriate response, but this is an obscure page from a 50+ year old comic book. As far as I know, no one is taking it seriously as marriage advice. I'd even say that the sexism in it is so over-the-top that most people who read it today would laugh at it and anyone taking it seriously would be looked at as the lunatic fringe. Which brings up a question. Is this kind of thing so anachronistic that making this a battleground obscures more subtle forms of sexism? Often, I'll tell a person that I see something as antisemitic, but they don't recognize antisemitism in anything short of actively lining up Jews for the ovens.
A minor point; this is a very flawed method of communication. Someone who knew me or who was familiar with the way I normally phrase things wouldn't have come to the same conclusion you did about me brushing off the sexism by calling it "a little Stepford Wives." I use understatement a lot to make points. I understand that you can't reasonably be expected to know that and maybe I should be extra careful about the way I express myself to strangers, but it's my natural way of talking. I'm not always aware of it.