I called the article "sexist bullshit" not you. I was explaining why the article was sexist and how, since you did not demonstrate that you fully understood why I was in RAGE about it.
You don't understand, or else you would not have come to the conclusion that it was "good, if basic, relationship advice." You'd be angered by the obvious and total demeaning of women (and men) in this article, instead of just brushing it off as "good advice" wrapped up in a little Stepford Wives." To me it is not a difference of "opinion," it is the fundamentals of sexism that are pretty clear-cut in this case.
I don't know how I could approach that any other way.
If you feel I am calling you sexist, then so be it. If that offends, then good. That means you don't like it and are trying not to be it. I don't want to be racist, but that doesn't mean I don't walk straight into my privilege from time to time and have to learn that my "opinions" are incorrect. It isn't personal, it's cultural, it's privilege. I don't hate you--I don't KNOW you. I'm just laying out why your ideas on the subject are flawed from the POV of a person most demeaned by it.