And here we come to the heart of the problem - in a Larsen versus Byrne bitch-slap fight, THERE ARE NO WINNERS.
Yes, Byrne certainly deserves criticisms for COUNTLESS things he's done, but by the same token, even most people who DON'T like a lot of Byrne's other work STILL like She-Hulk, so by including She-Hulk's portrayal under Byrne's pen under the heading of "Byrne's bad stuff," it looks like Larsen is just bitching about Byrne to hear himself bitch.
I mean, I'm no fan of Byrne, either, but if I were to cite his Fantastic Four run as "proof" of what a hack he is, I'd be condemned as a hater for the sake of hating, and rightly so, because his FF (father-daughter level age-play issues aside) was a darned good run.
And I guess that's where this fails for me - yes, Byrne arguably Has It Coming, but Larsen himself is probably the wrong person to try and deliver that smackdown, not in the least because his attempt to lay into Byrne falls short of as good a satirical dissection as it could have been, and instead comes across as little more than one bitter, grudge-wanky former "superstar" creator picking a fight with someone who's a lot more like himself than either one of them would care to admit.