Re: In which I passionately defend Keith Giffen only twenty years too late.
No, it deserved to be pointed out, because it was very, very close, and well, I don't think it's right that Giffen should prosper off a style that is so close to Munoz', because he has a huge company behind him and is working off profitable characters, while Munoz remained relatively obscure. I like Giffen but SINNER is worth Giffen's entire career. So it's something subject to question.
I love Sim(at least up to GUYS) and Crepax. And for me, they're both heavy influences. But if my work had ever resembled theirs as closely as Giffen's did Munoz, I'd expect to be questioned about it as well.