Exactly - kind of a reflection of changing social mores. I mean, you had this whole societal clash in the '60's because society was basically divided between the people who still believed that the government is automatically your friend, and the people who believed this to be a lie. If you brought a character into the middle of this who believed the first version, and was prepared to defend it with lethal force if necessary, he'd be incredibly divisive - some people would be going 'yeah! He's givin' th' young punks what for!', and the others would be going 'this is crazy; he's killing people, he's got to be stopped'. And there'd probably be some crossover between the two - people who admired the Super-American's patriotism but deplored his methods, and people who deplored both his methods and his convictions, but still held onto an image of him as this great WW2 hero. He's a character with some juice, he is, if the right writer took him on.