InsaneJournal

• Create Account
• IJ Login
• OpenID Login

Search by :  Username E-mail Region Interest AOL IM ICQ Number Yahoo! ID MSN Username Jabber

• View
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
• Journal
  • Post
  • Edit Entries
  • Customize Journal
  • Comment Settings
  • Recent Comments
  • Manage Tags
• Account
  • Manage Account
  • Viewing Options
  • Manage Profile
  • Manage Notifications
  • Manage Pictures
  • Manage Schools
  • Account Status
• Friends
  • Edit Friends
  • Edit Custom Groups
  • Friends Filter
  • Nudge Friends
  • Invite
  • Create RSS Feed
• Asylums
  • Post
  • Asylum Invitations
  • Manage Asylums
  • Create Asylum
• Site
  • Support
  • Upgrade Account
  • FAQs
  • Search By Location
  • Search By Interest
  • Search Randomly

bluefall (bluefall) wrote in scans_daily,

That it had to take Geoff Johns to come up with the most reasonable patch over 20 years later - that Clark was only Superboy in the 30th Century - still boggles my mind that nobody thought of it sooner.

Remember that they didn't remove Superboy from continuity because they removed his childhood adventures - that's backwards. They removed his childhood adventures because they removed Superboy. Byrne's reboot made him not powered as a kid. Making him 'only Superboy in the 30th century' isn't a reasonable patch when the whole point is that he couldn't have been Super period.

It wasn't until Johns retconned Byrne's retcon because he actually thinks Superbaby is a good idea that Clark participating in the Legion as a kid again became a plausible restoration.

(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:	( ) Anonymous- this asylum only allows commenting by members. You may comment here if you are a member of scans_daily. ( ) OpenID InsaneJournal user Username: Password: Login?  Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:	No HTML allowed in subject   Don't auto-format:
Message:	Check spelling during preview Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.