Well, he's deceased, so there won't be any more coming.
But no. My own experience of Eisner, granted, was mostly when I got the Kitchen Sink color SPIRIT series in the 80s, but eventually grew bored because after a while, it seemed more of the same. I came across stuff like CONTRACT WITH GOD later, and I imagine I would have reacted differently to it if, by then, I hadn't been trained in theatre and thus recognized that, while some cartoonists take a filmic approach, Eisner's was in fact theatrical, and this should be kept in mind when looking at the manner in which he does gesture and expression. Which only improved over time. I don't think exaggeration is bad in comics--if they aren't to be the kind of fumetti Marvel seems to want to make them, it's obligatory. (People like Epting or Ross should really start looking at Eisner for this reason)
Now, that said, his later work is really more the sort of thing I admire than enjoy. But that's probably because the concerns he talks about--of the elderly, the retired, the northeastern, and all very specific to that--aren't mine. Though some will be someday and I suppose I'll come back to it then, but I find it easy to leave for now. It's probably a good thing there's at least one long-form cartoonist who has work addressing that.
I will say I was very disappointed in THE PLOT. On one hand, it's fascinating historically. But the closer it gets to the present day, the weaker, I think, it is--I'm not sure if he quite gets the reasons for the appeal and survival of that foul book, particularly among some Muslims(and I felt he was unfair to Muslims in a scene near the end of the book, depicting them as slightly simian toughs). And overall, the book comes across a bit naive, almost broaching the real reason for its survival--that rationality is not actually a human motivator--but not quite getting there. I thought the book needed to understand its enemy a bit better, to try to understand how someone comes to accept it even though it's a hoax, like impoverished people in the mideast. But instead, he seems to think it's only hate that is the cause(rather than a symptom) and dismisses them, rather than understanding those he's (rightfully) condemning. So I found in the end it was informative, but unsatisfying and ultimately ineffective toward anyone but the choir.