You seem to have assumed wrongly that I live in your society, and I'm sorry about that. I live in the USA, not whatever benighted Republic you are from, where women no doubt are forced to wear traditional religious garb and take certain societal roles. Here we have freedom of opportunity AND laws that not only enforce that but may go a bit overboard in providing special rights based upon gender. Heck, our most powerful Legislator is a woman, and two women came close to the Presidency last time around (even if one of them was running on her husband's coattails; some traditions die harder than others.). You should really check us out. As far as the 'Birds' being an answer to a male-dominated field, I disagree. The JLA, for example, evolved organically as a largely male group, but there was no edict that excluded women. In fact, currently, I think it is roughly even in membership between the genders, and has a woman at the head. Far from " a space where they get to be in charge", the "Birds" makes certain that there is only one gender in their grouping. One might venture a guess that their leader is afraid that she cannot maintain authority with males around.