Re: Not Batman, but since we're talking superheroes and class
Right. You don't have to be rich and famous in your civilian identity to be a superhero. Some superheroes are rich people, and there is nothing wrong with that, but that doesn't mean that all of them can/should be. And that doesn't mean that to be an everyman sort of superhero you have to be unsuccessful at everything else.
What I liked about Spider-Man back in the day was that he had some difficulty in catching a break in his personal life because of being a superhero, but that didn't mean he was a useless shmuck out of costume. Pre-OMD/BND, Peter had a nice job as a high school science teacher, which to me is a very ordinary sort of modestly successful. To me, a superhero who is happily married and has a day job as a highschool teacher is so much more of an everyman than recent portrayals. Just because Spider-Man started out being a costumed crime fighter as a teenager doesn't mean he can't grow up and become a responsible, reasonably successful adult.