InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "I'm a PFLAG mom"

The Judges Of Sabra La Tau (sabra_la_iudex) wrote in sabra_la_tau,
@ 2012-01-07 11:09:00

Entry tags:

amami riku, aoi 'santa' kurashiki, ashikawa mitsuru, charles xavier, chrono, claude c. kenni, danielle 'dani' phantom, erik lehnsherr, jace beleren, kurono kei, kurow, shinonome hangetsu, sumeragi kururu, tifa lockhart, uchiha itachi, wanijima kaito, yuffie kisaragi, {kishitani shinra}, {zim}

Who: Everyone
Where: The Arena again
When: STOP. ZOMBIE TIME (part two, earthtime edition)
What:

[The battle continues, friend against friend, lover against lover and team against team. Staring down at it all, the King's face seems unusually haggard, hairline fractures forming every time another bracer shatters for those who watch closely.

It's every now and then, with no regular pattern or strength, you hear something rumble, followed by the ground under your feet shuddering.

But this really isn't the time to worry about that, is it? You hear a snap of fingers, and those who have been blessed by the King feel the quiet thrum of power, electricity at their fingertips.]

I think we've had enough games don't you? Ophiuchus, subdue the remainder.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] lone_centurion 2012-01-07 07:42 pm UTC (link)
	[Oh, whoop, let's get behind a table and throw some chairs.] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] sabra_la_iudex 2012-01-07 07:57 pm UTC (link)
	[WHAT KIND OF DEFENSE IS CHAIRS!!! . . . they actually do trip up most of those knights, but there's one left that manages to leap over them. It lowers its lance to strike.] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] lone_centurion 2012-01-07 08:04 pm UTC (link)
	[WHATEVER WORKS MAN.] [And rolling to get out of the way, ffff and ANOTHER FIRE OF THE GUN.] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] baddecisiondzur 2012-01-07 08:08 pm UTC (link)
	[and coming in, swinging her sword at the knight's head] Ah, Rory! (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] sabra_la_iudex 2012-01-07 08:09 pm UTC (link)
	[It falters. Just enough time for Tazendra's blow to connect, sending it crashing to the floor] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] lone_centurion 2012-01-07 08:10 pm UTC (link)
	[...so much dere.] Thanks Honor. Fighting one armed wasn't as good an idea as I thought. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] baddecisiondzur 2012-01-07 08:12 pm UTC (link)
	Ah, I would imagine it is not. [hacking at the knight; at least it'll distract it from getting back up] Cracks in the Orb, these foes do not have the courtesy to stay down when I stab them. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] lone_centurion 2012-01-07 08:13 pm UTC (link)
	I do have to admit, constructs are kind of an annoyance that way. I liked it better when it was just me doing that. [And getting up and helps with shooting foes.] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] sabra_la_iudex 2012-01-07 08:25 pm UTC (link)
	[THIS POOR KNIGHT :( YOU GUYS!!! It's cool though, his bros are making progress rushing up on you to save him] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] baddecisiondzur 2012-01-07 08:27 pm UTC (link)
	Ah, but at least that is something of a distraction. [explosions your way, guys! More designed to slow you down by forcing you to regather sand than to destroy you] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] lone_centurion 2012-01-07 08:32 pm UTC (link)
	Probably not a good thing, we still need to get to King. [Though, without my bracer...] [Will just continue his firing, going on his own is probably not a good idea right now.] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] sabra_la_iudex 2012-01-07 08:58 pm UTC (link)
	[Slowing them down seems to be effective right up until a bishop joins the fray. Enjoy your lightning!!] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] lone_centurion 2012-01-07 08:59 pm UTC (link)
	[Oh hey, table still nearby, LET'S USE THAT AS A SHIELD FOR LIGHTNING.] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] baddecisiondzur 2012-01-07 09:00 pm UTC (link)
	[under cover and going to lightning right back] Well, so there is sorcery. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] lone_centurion 2012-01-07 09:02 pm UTC (link)
	Your sorcery or his? Pretty sure King always had lightning power. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] baddecisiondzur 2012-01-07 09:03 pm UTC (link)
	His, but he had not yet used it in this battle. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] lone_centurion 2012-01-07 09:05 pm UTC (link)
	Probably only so many things he can give that gift to. Or being showy. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] baddecisiondzur 2012-01-07 09:07 pm UTC (link)
	There is some significance in the shapes of his constructs? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] lone_centurion 2012-01-07 09:11 pm UTC (link)
	They're chess pieces. A strategy game. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] baddecisiondzur 2012-01-07 09:12 pm UTC (link)
	Well! (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [NOT THE CAVALRY YOU WANTED] lone_centurion 2012-01-07 09:16 pm UTC (link)
	[And then more doom was happening.] (Reply to this) (Parent)

(Read comments) -