Ideas for InsaneJournal
ideas
..::. :.: .:.:::...:::.
Page Summary


March 2024
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31

Per [info]sakura's suggestion, I'm going to repost my comment here with a small prelude. I love IJ. When GJ died and LJ started censoring, I was firmly on the IJ bandwagon. I think Squeaky is a good administrator in general and was impressed with his attentiveness. As the site has expanded, however, I feel that communication has diminished. I feel that this is in part because Squeaky is trying to run this site on the basis of a) what time he has to work on it and b) what time the volunteers have. I think he's doing the best he can with what time he has. While this is the sort of approach I would understand from a free website, I feel that offering paid accounts holds a website to a higher standard of quality and customer service. For that reason, as detailed below, I feel there needs to be a reliable support staff paid to deal with bugs and issues much more quickly:

It isn't the responsibility of volunteers to keep the site running. This is a site that I have personally spent hundreds of dollars on, between permanent accounts, rename tokens, and userpics. If an administrator is going to charge those prices, they need to hire a support staff. Period. I moved here from LJ, but the one thing I will say in LJ's favor is that my technical issues were addressed more quickly than three weeks. A lot of people are saying "it's better than GJ." It is, but GJ didn't have the responsibility to its users that a pay site does. I feel that Squeaky has been trying to get by on his free time, with the aid of volunteers, and issues and bugs have gone unresolved because of it. The service needs to be better, period. This isn't any volunteer's fault - they're doing what you can. Volunteers shouldn't have to bear the brunt of it.

Somebody might say "Well, if you don't like the service, leave. " The problem is that I've already bought permanent accounts here. Even if you take the $70 at face value, that means I've paid for at least two more years of service. For that kind of money, I deserve to have my issues and bugs corrected in a timely manner. It bothers me that we haven't even had recent communication about WHEN they're going to be fixed. They should be in the process of BEING fixed. This shouldn't fall on volunteers to fix.

Edit: I understand that business has been priority, but this "business now, bugs later" system does not work if people have paid $70+ for permanent accounts. There needs to be progress on bugs even if business is Squeaky's focus. Even if you only hire a technician to consult and fix bugs a few hours a week, that's something. Some of these bugs haven't been touched for weeks. That's unacceptable IMO for how much is being paid.

Comments

I'm not really suggesting hiring 8 hours a day, 5 days a week support staff. I think that's probably too ambitious for a site that has a lot of free accounts. But I don't see it as all or nothing. If Squeaky can only afford to pay a technician for a few hours consult a week, that's better than nothing. A lot of these technical bugs seem (to me) to be things that require sitting down and working out, time that he doesn't always personally have. I think he said that the quickreply issue needed to be "rebuilt" from the ground up. Why not hire a few hours of an expert's time to rebuild that page? They wouldn't be multi-tasking, they'd be paid to focus completely on that a short time. The same goes for a lot of these issues, I'd think. What bothers me is that Squeaky says "I have to deal with business right now." If you're letting people spend $70 on a permanent account, you need to have a better system in place than "business now, bugs later." You need to have somebody working on bugs, even if it's only part-time.

I think that's a good point, but as far as I remember (and this could be a misremembrance), the permanent sales that have been held most recently were held to raise X amount of dollars needed to complete repairs/buy a server/move etc. I don't know that there's a wild profit being made off of people's accounts that do any more than contribute to the basic maintenance of the site. I'm not saying I know what the financial situation is, nor do I think your points are invalid, I just don't know how feasible it is to set aside a budget when we have so few users over all (compared to LJ, for example), and the number of paid accounts is probably very small.

I don't think there's a wild profit either, but I find it difficult to believe that there's no money at all. Even if he has $200 to spare for tech support, that's something. My main problem is that a lot of us bought those accounts when the site was a lot more stable, under the impression that it would continue to be. Now after the code change, using the console clears filters and there's no quickreply. I don't know that I'd have bought an account without quickreply. There are unanswered support requests from three weeks back, some people who haven't been able to post to their journal for weeks. Squeaky was offering to "compensate" people for downtime at one point, why not put that money into hiring part-time tech support? Why not have another account sale or sell more userpics and put that money toward tech support? I don't think anything evil or sneaky is going on here, but there has to be some accountability here if you're going to sell a service. It feels like some of what was paid for at a more stable time is now missing.