Dark Christianity
dark_christian
.::: .::..:.::.:.
Back August 24th, 2007 Forward
dogemperor [userpic]
Texas school board might reject intelligent design curriculum

LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY [info]exotic_princess)

A faint glimmer of hope emerges from the Lone Star State...

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/5080673.html


AUSTIN — A majority of State Board of Education members said the theory of intelligent design should be left out of the science curriculum for public schools.

The board will rewrite the science curriculum next year and some observers expect backers of intelligent design to push for the theory's inclusion.

In interviews with The Dallas Morning News, 10 of the board's 15 members said they wouldn't support requiring the teaching of intelligent design. One board member said she was open to the idea. Four board members didn't respond to the newspaper's phone calls.

Current Mood: amazed
dogemperor [userpic]

LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY [info]rechan)

In case you needed a reminder as to what the real agenda for the Pro-Life debate is, here you go:

Eighty six anti-abortion groups have committed to opposing all forms of contraception. Among the groups are Right to Life of Kansas, Pro-Life Ohio, the Life League of New Mexico, North Dakota Right to Life, Connecticut Right to Life, California Right to Life, and the Delaware Pro-life Coalition. However, few of these state's media outlets are covering the groups' opposition to contraception--no matter how eager the groups are to display their extreme agenda. Thus the public doesn't know that their elected officials are pandering to anti-birth control forces in order to secure these groups' support. Yet these groups and their unpopular and dangerous agenda escape notice. Because of this, we'll wake up one day to discover that almost half the candidates running for president are opposed to contraception. Maybe tomorrow?

And as the Media neglects to point this out, The GOP presidential candidates are eager to exploit it:
Mr. Romney's code, deciphered, meant, "I, like you, hope to reclassify the most commonly used forms of contraceptives as abortions." In fact, he told the crowd, he already had some practice redefining contraception: "I vetoed a so-called emergency contraception bill that gave young girls abortive drugs without prescription or parental consent."

--snip--

Presidential hopeful Sen. Sam Brownback, Republican of Kansas, beefed up his anti-contraception resume by co-sponsoring a bill to de-fund the nation's largest contraception provider, Planned Parenthood, by excluding it from Title X family planning for the poor. Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain's campaign officials boast he has "consistently voted against taxpayer-funded contraception programs." And Mr. McCain reports that his adviser on sexual-health matters is Sen. Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma, who leads campaigns claiming condoms are unsafe and opposing emergency contraception.

Another presidential candidate, Rep. Tom Tancredo, like Mr. Romney, has ventured far into the "contraception-is-abortion" territory. According to Mr. Tancredo, a Colorado Republican, emergency contraception "cheapens human life and simply uses a woman's body to dispose of the child instead of a doctor." By the same logic, so do the birth control pill, the contraceptive patch, the IUD, the NuvaRing, and the Depo-Provera shot - which, it's worth noting, together account for 40 percent of the birth control American women use.

dogemperor [userpic]
If this isn't the right place, feel free to delete this

LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY [info]the_flowergirl)

But I laughed at this.

http://www.tyndale.com/products/details.asp?isbn=978-1-4143-1680-2

Current Mood: amused
Current Music: Billy Idol-Rebel Yell
Back August 24th, 2007 Forward