LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY nebris)
( A Bush-funded prison initiative that fast-tracked parole for Christian converts has been swatted down in the federal courts. )
Evangelical Conversion-for-Parole Program Thwarted
Krazy Kate kan't read
LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY Katherine Harris Calls Church-State Separation 'A Lie'Okay, just an honest question here. At what point do you cross the line into treasonous territory? Not saying Krazy Kate has done so, but there becomes a point where you're advocating something that's antithetical enough to the system that we have to start asking questions like this. And it's only fair. If a Commuist were running for office on a platform that advocated, I don't know, abolition of state's rights and the suppression of religious practice, there's no question that the Right would label that as an attack on our Republic. And they'd be correct in doing so. So when Krazy Kate starts "revising" the establishment clause and pretty much ignoring Jefferson's own writings on the subject, are we justified in suggesting that she has wandered into terrain that might reasonably be construed as an attack on the Constitution? And if not, where is the line? :xpost: ![]() LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY Review of 'Darwin's Deadly Legacy'
LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY |