Continuing with my post that I started here, I'm continuing with my critical look at the whole A-Beka curriculum. As I noted previously:
A few months ago, I posted a discussion of the specific ideology taught in dominionist curricula, including the A-Beka curriculum program used in many dominionist private school and homeschool communities.
This particular thread has gained a bit of new relevance, between California officially disallowing admission of students solely educated using A-Beka curriculum due to its educational content being below state minimum standards and a legal case involving groups trying to push a textbook commonly used in A-Beka biology courses.
Hence, I'm going to post my own little analysis of just WHY California would find it unsuitable for kids entering college level courses (I actually stated in the original thread this was likely to happen) and how this could
hurt Pennsylvania students in the long run if dominionists get their way.
( Onward to part 2 )
And that largely does it for now. I've been working continuously since from about 6pm to about 1:10am on this; people are free to comment in the threads.
EDIT: Minor, minor edits for formatting. Never ever ever type long essays fueled by sleep deprivation and research geekdom. :3
A critical look at the A-Beka curriculum, part 2
Revised Science Textbook for Christians
LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY ccroft) Evolution vs. ID discussion
LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY sunfell) Q: Why not teach both sides? A new likeminded group (per Talk2Action)
DefCon America (short for Campaign to Defend the Constitution: Because the Religious Right is Wrong) is a new group inspired by other groups like MoveOn.org that is--much like us and Talk2Action--dedicated to specifically fighting the dominionist movement on a political level and funding political initiatives to fight dominionism. Breakin news from CNN.com...
LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY ellid) |