InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "Take candy from strangers."

hermione granger (msknowitall) wrote in colligo_network,
@ 2009-10-03 22:58:00

Entry tags:

scorpius malfoy

I'm so glad the potion worked. It was a little more difficult than what I'm used to, but with so many people helping out, it went smoothly.

[filtered to people from the HP world;]
Are all of you alright? I know a few of you were affected by Barbas, and I just want to double-check.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	msknowitall 2009-10-04 04:04 am UTC (link)
	And there you go, misinterpreting and overanalyzing again. Find something to do, and quickly. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	snark_master 2009-10-04 04:07 am UTC (link)
	Oh, wait, when you mean 'everything people write' you were only over exaggerating for show! Dear me. Here you tell me that I should take your comments at face value and not imply anything. So I listen, and take your comments word for word, and now you want me it infer meaning, or lack of meaning, in what you say. Make up your mind, you are damn near confusing. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

msknowitall
2009-10-04 04:16 am UTC (link)

I was talking about my posts. The word 'people' was just a generalization, since I don't pay enough attention to you and your forum-related exploits and I don't know what you say to other people. Does that make it clearer? And in that vein, why do you spend so much time arguing with me almost everytime I say something on here? If you don't like me, it would be less of a hassle if you just didn't bother, don't you think?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

snark_master
2009-10-04 04:24 am UTC (link)

Over generalizations all over the place, my god.

We have conversed a total of three times using these devices, which, incidentally is not the totally number of times you have either made your own posts, or jumped into comment on others. Comparatively, these three 'conversations' are hardly 'almost every time'.

If you do not know what I say to other people then refrain from making untrue, over generalized statements about such.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	msknowitall 2009-10-04 04:29 am UTC (link)
	You still didn't answer my question. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

snark_master
2009-10-04 04:43 am UTC (link)

Oh, I see, we are back to literal, word for word - I thought that was rhetorical, you know, in the vein of inferring from your comments.

You insulted my status, and intelligence - not to mention everyone who was present two night previous - I merely spoke up to clarify your post, which I maintain is misleading.

Here, I will help point out why:

The subject in your second sentence is ambiguous leaving the reader to wonder what the action contained in the next independent clause could be modifying.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

msknowitall
2009-10-04 04:46 am UTC (link)

The people who matter will know what I meant and what I was referring to, rather than trying to point out something to try and make me feel stupid or like I was insulting people on purpose.

Now, I'm going to kindly ask that you leave me alone, and that you stop talking to me altogether. If you do, I won't respond, so you'll only be wasting your own supposedly precious time.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(Read comments) -