Snapedom

The January Challenge: Lily revisited

The World of Severus Snape

********************
Anonymous users, remember that you must sign all your comments with your name or nick! Comments left unsigned may be screened without notice.

********************

Welcome to Snapedom!
If you want to see snapedom entries on your LJ flist, add snapedom_syn feed. But please remember to come here to the post to comment.

This community is mostly unmoderated. Read the rules and more in "About Snapedom."

No fanfic or art posts, but you can promote your fanfic and fanart, or post recommendations, every Friday.

The January Challenge: Lily revisited

Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
The Challenge for January 2011:

Lily revisited




Years ago (we've been around for a while, oh yes!)we had 'Severus and Lily' as a monthly challenge.

[info]alicekinsno1 suggested to take a closer look at Lily's character:

Maybe something that discusses the character of Lily more deeply? I'd love to see what some of your ideas are for just how Lily went from treating Snape so harshly and talking back to James, to being the stereotypical "saintly mother" at the end of her life. There's something about her personality that doesn't add up.

That is to say, how her apparently selfless decision to die for her baby makes sense in light of the way she treated Severus or even James. With possibly a side comment about how despite being so powerful and gifted she didn't really show any of that by dying pleading for her baby's life without even trying to take on Voldemort.


Please post your entries here or in a separate post. I'm looking forward to your entries.
If you have ideas for new challenges, please post them here. (This is a new list, your earlier suggestions are still in the old post).
  • Re: Lily, Sev, Mary, dark magic

    Sorry, I must agree to disagree here. The only real Dark Magic spells in the books do nothing else but hurt the victims of those spells. Sectumsemprs means forever cut. Snape wrote the spells for 'enemies'. Enemies tend to be alive. If their dead what's the use of cutting them up and there are planty of spells for cooking. We see Molly casting a spell on her cooking knives to cut up potatoes. I rather doubt she was using Setumsempra. Besides Snape himself classified it as Dark Magic. His words to Harry were that he didn't know that Harry knew such Dark Magic when Harry was stupid enough to use the spell on Draco. There has to be some that qualifies spells as Dark, the Dark spells we see hurt people. I do think it is that simple.
    • Re: Lily, Sev, Mary, dark magic

      I am not saying we don't see dark spells hurt people! Or that some characters consider sectumsempra dark. My only point is that choosing one aspect these *four* spells have in common as *the* definitive characteristic of all dark magic - what makes magic dark or not dark - is an INTERPRETATION. It is NOT a coherent theory of dark magic explicitly spelled out by the text. (Whereas for example it IS spelled out by the text that magic for example cannot create information; this is part of JKR's magic system spell out IN the text.)

      It is an interpretation allowed by the text, but there are other interpretations ALSO permitted by the evidence we have in the text. The TEXT ITSELF does not state explicitly that the interpretation you make is correct or not, so nobody can say their interpretation of dark magic is the only correct one. It does not give a definitive account of what dark magic is; that is a matter of *interpretation.* That is my point. That you are making an INTERPRETATION, which is not the same thing as something spelled out by the text itself as a clear coherent theory of dark magic. I am not offering a counter interpretation of what dark magic is, I am pointing out that it is something we must necessarily interpret because it *is not spelled out textually.* Am I being unclear?
      • Re: Lily, Sev, Mary, dark magic

        I'm not saying that there is a definitive explanation about what qualifies as Dark Magic. I'm saying that the Dark Magic spells that we do see only injure or kill their victims. That seems to be their purpose. So for me it seems quite reasonable to say that Dark Magic causes harm/death to the victim, hence the term Dark. Why do you think the spells are termed Dark? I don't think any Dark Magic spell is created to be done at parties as entertainment. They are created to be weapons and they are not nice. But then I don't think guns are nice either and I'm leery of knives. A very peaceful person, me, myself and I.

        PS, I think that Memory Charm that Lockhart used and it backfired on him. I would term that as Dark. Anything that would wipe out a human being's memory as permanently as that did, is certainly Dark in my book.
        • Re: Lily, Sev, Mary, dark magic

          They we aren't really disagreeing. My point all along was what you said in your first sentence: that in the text there is no definitive explanation. (I'm not saying it's unreasonable to calls spells that harm dark, I'm ONLY pointing out that that is a personal interpretation, not an explanation the text puts forward itself.) Therefore all the explanations we propose are personal interpretations. Which is fine; it's just that occasionally a specific interpretation gets treated as if it were textual canon, which was why my argument came up in the first place actually. I'm not saying your interpretation is wrong or unreasonable, I'm only saying it's one of multiple possible interpretations of the text. I'm not trying to insult, sorry if I do. I'm only trying to be clear about what argument I am actually putting forth.
          • Re: Lily, Sev, Mary, dark magic

            It's fun to discuss things sometimes. The only information we get from the text really is that some magic is Dark with a capitol D. But yes we are agreeing that whatever it is, it's not good.
Powered by InsaneJournal