Arguably, yes. Abuse is often a generational phenomenon, so it's likely that Abusive Dad there was the recipient of similar treatment from his own Abusive Dad. A history of abuse is often correlated with features of Antisocial Personality, and though we don't see enough of Abusive Dad's behaviors in the above example to make a full diagnosis, responding to frustration with violence and a lack of compassion for the feelings of others are also both associated with Antisocial Personality. (As a colleague of mine once put it, lots of people use violence inside the home, but if someone is using violence in public spaces as a way of responding to frustration, that's a red flag for Antisocial.)
Another feature of Antisocial is a disregard for rule of law or social convention. Taxes are particularly pertinent in this regard in that they are a form of self-sacrifice that benefits a great number of people outside of one's self--exactly the kind of broad, impersonal compassion that someone with Antisocial features would find both difficult and pointless. So, if we're looking at the available evidence as an argument for a provisional Antisocial diagnosis, then yes, I'd say it's likely that the abuse and the cheating on taxes would both be features of the same personality structure.
Y'know, it's possible I'm putting too much thought into this. Maybe?