Dark Christianity
.::: .::..:.::.:.
  Viewing 0 - 2  
dogemperor [userpic]
What do Dommies really use Conservapedia for?

LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY [info]thebustocrookes)

Remember our chums at
Conservapedia “the trustworthy encyclopedia” (set up to give Dommies an online resource that shows the world *their* way without the liberal bias of, erm, facts)?

There’s a story in today’s Guardian about the most viewed pages on Conservapedia:

Main page: 1,951,467
Homosexuality: 1,810,286
Homosexuality and hepatitis: 518,398
Homosexuality and parasites: 453,062
Gay bowel syndrome: 429,873
Homosexuality and promiscuity: 422,589
Homosexual couples and domestic violence: 374,456
Homosexuality and gonorrhoea: 332,262
Homosexuality and anal cancer: 294,852
Homosexuality and mental health 294,223

Good to see what the "fair and balanced" people out there are using it to research…

dogemperor [userpic]
Proof in the gene pool

LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY [info]mocuirdhgalla)
There could be proof that being gay is not a choice.

However, it would still be a sin.

This is a rather simplistic over-view of the article, but my brain is spinning, my kids are doing homework, and I think I ruptured a major blood vessel in my brain in the reading of this.

What I brought away form the article is the following:

Homosexuality could be fixed with simple genetic altering.
Genetic testing and altering for anything else would be a sin.
If parents didn't "fix" their kids before birth, then their kids would still be sinners and doomed.

This is a good news bad news senario if I have ever heard one.  Two steps forward and a giant leap backwards.

I'm sorry.  I have really lost my ability to speak in any sort of sensical manner.

Help?  Discuss? 

Current Mood: contemplative
  Viewing 0 - 2