Dark Christianity
dark_christian
.::: .::..:.::.:.

May 2008
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

dogemperor [userpic]

LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY [info]navytron89) Some more scary news from Religious Reich Wing News found on</a></b></a>[info]americablog

From the Tom Tancredo wingnut school of Homeland Security, the denizens of WorldNetDaily have the answer to the whole holy war thing.

Should U.S. threaten nuclear annihilation of Muslim holy sites for deterrence?



Why is it that  people who believe we should nuke another country are allowed to procreate and vote?  

Here we are in the twenty-first Century and these people believe that violence solves all their answers and in God/Jesus' Name to boot. I'm sorry, if we look a few facts not every Muslim is a terrorist or threat to public society and that destroying a religious/holy site just leads us down a darker path. Its bad enough that religious zealots in the past as well as recent history destroyed holy sites in the name of their verison of GOD. Seriously its the long term outcome of retaliation is what concerns me, as well as serving as a rallying point for zealots. 

There is nothing scarier than zealotry driven people wether Christian, Muslim or other faith and destroying their icons to make a point just seals the deal for these people to justify their actions.  The cycle of violence needs to be stopped, reason and logic should be used instead of bigotry and religious phobias/dementia to justify the destruction of anothers beliefs.  

While I perfer to debunk the whole Christian/religious deity Mythos like Richard Dawkins, I still like the pagentry of the church and think that the world would still be a moral place without GOD in it.  A society doesn't need a deity to exist. But a deity needs society to exist.  If a deity doesn't exist only the clergy are out of a job and I guess they don't  like the thought of getting a real job.

Current Mood: gloomy