Dark Christianity
dark_christian
.::: .::..:.::.:.
Back October 26th, 2005 Forward
dogemperor [userpic]
Gilkyson: Man of God

LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY [info]gleef)

Heard a song on the radio this morning today (WRPI - a local college station), it was a Christian Country/Folk song by Eliza Gilkyson called Man of God, from her album Paradise Hotel. It's some powerful Christian backlash against the Dominionist pretensions and general attitude of this administration:

lyrics )

If you regularly listen to a Country station on the radio, I suggest you call in to request they play it. :-)

Current Mood: encouraged
dogemperor [userpic]
All righty, then...

LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY [info]sunfell)

I have no idea where our previous poster was coming from, but to be honest, her post had nothing to do with the purpose or point of this community. I thought about letting it ride, especially considering some of the excellent and measured replies it got, but ultimately, it had to go. Anime and reality do not tend to mix well, a lot like religion and government. People can believe what they want to, and I know that there are a wide variety of beliefs represented on this board, but we're not here to get into the finer threads of theology- other communities can handle that. We're here to shed critical and educational light on a previously shadowy sect of Christianity that is determined to hijack our government, overturn our constitution, and turn our democratic republic into a theocratic kingdom. Battling demons and cheerleading for Christ may be part of the discussion (which can get really entertaining), but it isn't the purpose of this community.

Bush is just the tip of the iceberg, and in the greater scheme of things, he is rather unimportant, except for his function as a figurehead for this sect to rally around. The real reigns and interconnections of power and influence lie out of sight in the murkier depths of this whole thing, and those depths, those interconnections, those actions are what we're here to examine. If you read the news, a lot of this is finally coming to light, and I'd like to think that communities like ours are providing the illumination.

Sorry about nipping a potentially fascinating discussion in the bud- but I hope that you understand my point of view.

dogemperor [userpic]
Americablog: Target reinterprets Civil Rights Act

LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY [info]sunfell)

This AmericaBlog article talks about an interesting interpretation of the 1964 Civil Rights Act:


Target reinterprets 1964 Civil Rights Act to give religious bigots full rights against YOU
by John in DC - 10/24/2005 02:52:00 PM

Target has just done what 40 years of religious right advocacy couldn't. They've now reinterpreted the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include permitting individual religious right bigots to discriminate against YOU in public accommodations so long as they claim that discrimination is based on their religion.

What that means? Target is claiming the 1964 Civil Rights Act gives their employees the right to do whatever they want to any customer so long as the employee claims their actions are motivated by their religion. Funny, but when we studied civil rights in law school, I don't remember that section of the Civil Rights Act.

Here's what Target is saying, then read my analysis below:Read more... )

dogemperor [userpic]

LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY [info]kalibex)

Danforth criticizes Christian sway in GOP

Back October 26th, 2005 Forward