Alright, darlings. I have some thoughts I'd like to share with the class.
It is my opinion that this every-man-for-themselves free-for-all lunacy is, well, amateur hour to be honest. I don't see it working in the long term. The past few days have been
infinitely fun, don't get me wrong, but I'm looking at the bigger picture. Chase at least seems now to be quite certain that all of the new lot are bad eggs. To be sure, Chase is a paranoid little loon. I can imagine he had quite the impressive trenchcoat collection in his youth, and there was probably a rule in all of his schools not to make any sudden noises around him just in
case the bugger went Columbine, but I digress. He's a loon, but one that has somehow managed to carve out a little niche for himself here. There is a small degree of respect for him, and I would personally
love to see that reputation torn to shreds, but I don't think the current methods of bedlam are going to do it.
If you disagree with me, by all means, go about your business. I would be delighted to be proven wrong.
It's never happened before, it'd be quite the learning experienceIt is my opinion that Experiment B would work better as a team effort, with everyone playing to their own unique sets of strengths. We could coordinate, share ideas and stratagems, and I believe work more effectively as a whole. That isn't to say bedlam is without its merits; we were told to sow discord, and there's been plenty of that to go around in the last few days. I simply don't feel it's the sort of thing that can be kept up long term without immediately drawing suspicion to yourself every time something goes wrong. I think it would be dangerous to our cause to have the majority of the group on the outs, so to speak, with the whole house. There are exceptions, of course. Simms, I still think your roll as an aggressor is a good one. Going balls out with it and getting in peoples faces is
good. It's something these people haven't had to deal with much, and now they have to figure out how to deal with you, or if they will at all. I still think your talents are more effective with a partner at your back. Like your gambit with Roman - that was quite inspired.
Basically, I'd like to put it out there. Who wants to make this a team effort, and who prefers to go lone wolf. If my feelings are in the minority, I think we should at least come to an agreement not to screw each other over. If anyone wants to team up, I have a lot to bring to the table. I've been here a while, and I have an extensive log of notes and half-formed ideas I would happily share with the group for a bit of brainstorming.
Where does everyone stand?