The oath is almost weirder than the idiosyncratic way it's annotated in the notes. So far, we've been able to transform the oath back into a standard format, but it uses constants where I expect variables and variables where I expect constants. It's obfuscated arithmancy, and I don't even think it was done that way on purpose.
The firm of Prewett and More Prewett have managed by sheer bloodymindedness to make a reduced test case that we can use to test the modified oath.
I now bring to the stand Master Prewett to explain how we are endeavoring to test the Oath, and our results so far...