No no no no no, I can't begin to answer that with a no strong enough. There's no need, that's-- NO.
I mean that people - in public entries - often expose their political sympathies. And we have all types here - those who profit off of other people's vulnerabilities and pasts, those who genuinely have histories with strife and revolutions we can't even imagine. I mean, we can comb through the public comments and entries of the journals, compare who's there with who advocates for or shows to the meeting, and have a better idea of what numbers we're working with.